DEVELOPMENT OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES IN THE SYSTEM OF CONTINUOUS LEARNING OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDENTS: EXPERIENCE AND PROSPECTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-0774.2025.4.6Keywords:
cognitive resilience, educational environment, learning autonomy, metacognitive strategies, reflection, self-regulation.Abstract
The purpose of this article is to conduct a comprehensive theoretical study of the role of metacognitive strategies in the process of teaching English to students in the system of continuing education, as well as to determine their significance for the formation of learning autonomy, self-regulation, and psychological resilience of students in conditions of military challenges. The present study is an analytical and theoretical systematic review of scientific sources, which ensure a comprehensive analysis of contemporary approaches to the development of metacognitive competence in the context of foreign language education. The methodological foundation of the study aligns with the prevailing scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, generalization, and comparison. These methodologies ensure consistency in the processing of both theoretical and empirical materials. The analysis indicates that metacognitive strategies play a pivotal role in enhancing the effectiveness of English language learning, as they facilitate the transition from external regulation to independent, conscious, and reflective learning. Research indicates that the implementation of strategic planning, systematic monitoring, and self-assessment strategies fosters critical thinking and the development of the capacity for self-observation, self-regulation, and the refinement of one’s own learning activities. Research demonstrates that the implementation of a metacognitive approach has a positive effect on students’ motivation to learn, internal autonomy, and resilience to stress factors in the learning environment. Research indicates that the effective development of metacognitive strategies is contingent upon the creation of a pedagogical environment that prioritizes reflection, formative assessment, collaboration, and the integration of digital educational technologies. Students’ metacognitive activity acts as an integrative mechanism, combining cognitive, emotional, and behavioral components of learning. This ensures continuity and flexibility in the learning process. The findings substantiate the notion that the cultivation of metacognitive strategies within the framework of continuous education constitutes a pivotal prerequisite for the development of a self-regulated, reflective, and resilient personality.
References
Kravchenko, O. (2023). Cotsialno-psykholohichna pidtrymka mentalnoho zdorovia uchasnykiv osvitnoho protsesu v kryzovykh sytuatsiiakh (praktychnyi dosvid) [Socio-psychological support of mental health of the educational process participants in crisis situations (practical experience)]. Social Work and Education, 10 (1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.23.1.4
Sidletskyi, S., & Shandar, A. (2024). Vyshcha osvita v Ukraini v umovakh voiennoho stanu: vyklyky ta priorytety [Higher education of Ukraine under the conditions of the martial law: challenges and priorities]. Economy and Society, 64. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-64-151
Khraban, T. (2023). Aktualni pytannia psykholohichnoho blahopoluchchia molodi pid chas navchannia za viiskovym profilem: pryklad Ukrainy [Current issues of psychological well-being of young people studying for military specialties: a case study in Ukraine], Educational Analytics of Ukraine, 1 (22), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.32987/2617-8532-2023-1-51-66
Khraban, T. (2024). Rekomendatsii shchodo yakisnoho vysvitlennia problem neperervnoi osvity [Guidelines for quality coverage of continuing education issues]. Neperervna profesiina osvita: teoriia i praktyka, 3(80), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-0774.2024.3.5
Cai, Y. (2024). Metacognitive strategy use in foreign language learning fluctuates from both ends towards the middle: Longitudinal evidence for the Island Ridge Curve. System, 123, 103324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103324
Dickson, K., Yeung, C. (2022). PRISMA 2020 updated guideline. British Dental Journal, 232, 760–761. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4359-7
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34 (10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Guanuche, A., Paucar, W., Oñate, W., & Caiza, G. (2025). Immersive Haptic Technology to Support English Language Learning Based on Metacognitive Strategies. Applied Sciences, 15 (2), 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15020665
Khosravi, R., Dastgoshadeh, A. & Jalilzadeh, K. (2023). Writing metacognitive strategy-based instruction through flipped classroom: an investigation of writing performance, anxiety, and self-efficacy. Smart Learning Environments. 10, 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00264-8
Ma, L. & Li, B. & Jiao, Y. & Liu, J. (2023). Motivation profiles of Chinese rural foreign language learners: link with learning strategy and achievement. Applied Linguistics Review. 15. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0198
Marenco, D. J., Juanías, J., Molina, C. (2024). Language learning strategies of Colombian learners of English as a foreign language. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13, 2739–2748. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i4.28739
Shih, H.J., Huang, S.C. (2022). EFL learners’ metacognitive development in flipped learning: A comparative study. Interactive Learning Environments, 30 (8), 1448–1460. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1728343
Sun, Q., Zhang, L. J., Carter, S. (2024). English as a foreign language learners' metacognitive experiences and writing development: Unraveling the process of learning EFL writing. Learning and Individual Differences, 115, 102540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102540
Teng, M. F., & Yue, M. (2023). Metacognitive writing strategies, critical thinking skills, and academic writing performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Metacognition and Learning, 18 (1), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09328-5
Teng, M. F., Ma, M. (2024). Assessing metacognition-based student feedback literacy for academic writing. Assessing Writing, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100811
Teng, M. F., Wang, C., & Wu, J. G. (2021). Metacognitive Strategies, Language Learning Motivation, Self-Efficacy Belief, and English Achievement During Remote Learning: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. RELC Journal, 54 (3), 648–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211040268
Wang, K. & Zhang, L. J. & Cooper, M. (2025).Taking stock of metacognitive strategies and collaborative writing for EFL learners’ writing development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 68, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101211
Wang, K., Zhang, L.J. & Cooper, M. (2025). Metacognitive Instruction for Improving the Effectiveness of Collaborative Writing for EFL Learners’ Writing Development. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34, 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00886-7
Xu, Z. (2023). Metacognition in Language Teaching and Research: A Conversation With Professor Lawrence Jun Zhang. RELC Journal, 54 (1), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231157497
Yu, S., Jiang, L., Liu C., & Zhou, N. (2022). Profiles of Chinese Secondary Students’ L2 Writing Motivation and Engagement: An Exploratory Study. Educational Psychology, 42 (8), 972–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2108765
Zhang, W., Zhang, D., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Metacognitive Instruction for Sustainable Learning: Learners’ Perceptions of Task Difficulty and Use of Metacognitive Strategies in Completing Integrated Speaking Tasks. Sustainability, 13 (11), 6275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116275
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Тетяна Храбан

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
