TEACHING ENGLISH INTONATION: CHALLENGES AND EFFECTIVE PRACTICES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-0774.2025.3.10Keywords:
English intonation, learner reflections, phonetics instruction, pronunciation teaching, questionnaire-based study.Abstract
This study explores how first-year Ukrainian university students approach English intonation, what they find difficult, what they understand, and which types of classroom practice seem most helpful. The research was conducted as part of an introductory phonetics course and used a mixed-method questionnaire completed by 42 students of English Philology and Translation. While most participants recognise that intonation plays a key role in communication, helping to show emotion, signal meaning, and shape spoken interaction, they often struggle to use it naturally. The responses point to a strong preference for interactive practice: listening and repeating after native speakers, rehearsing short dialogues, and getting immediate feedback from the teacher. Several students also mentioned recording themselves, tracking pitch with arrows, or using apps to visualise intonation. These responses suggest that learners benefit from a mix of listening, imitation, visual support, and self-monitoring. Despite having a theoretical understanding of intonation categories, many still find it difficult to apply this knowledge in real time. Students describe problems with pitch direction, sentence stress, rhythm, and pausing. Their unedited comments show how first-language influence, limited exposure to natural English speech, and the pressure to monitor pronunciation while speaking can all make intonation feel awkward or artificial. Rather than repeating patterns mechanically, learners appear to need space for trial, repetition, and reflection. These findings are consistent with earlier research on intonation learning and suggest that what helps most is regular, low-pressure practice tied to real communication rather than isolated drills. For EFL contexts where natural input is limited, these learner reflections offer useful insights into how intonation instruction can be made more effective.
References
Akkarapon, A., Muthmainnah, & Al Yakin, A. (2025). Examining EFL Students’ Perceptions and Experiences with AI-driven Metaverse Environments for Developing Communication Skills. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7 (5), 712–726. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i5.9453
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://scispace.com/pdf/teaching-pronunciation-a-course-book-and-reference-guide-mx78rjrl5z.pdf
Chun, D. M. (2002). Discourse intonation in L2: From theory and research to practice. John Benjamins. http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/47335/1/53.pdf
Couper, G. (2006). The short- and long-term effects of pronunciation instruction. Prospect, 21 (1), 46–66. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.153023
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39 (3), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486
Hahn, L. D. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38 (2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588378
Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34 (3), 475–505. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000150
Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford University Press.
Kang, O. (2010). Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38 (2), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.01.005
Liu, D., McGregor, A., Zielinski, B., Reed, M., & Meyers, C. (2024). ESL teachers’ metalanguage as evidence of their metalinguistic knowledge of the English intonation system. Language Awareness, 34 (2), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2024.2370886
Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39 (3), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485
Mennen, I. (2007). Phonological and phonetic influences in non-native intonation. In J. Trouvain & U. Gut (Eds.), Non-native prosody: Phonetic description and teaching practice (pp. 53–76). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198751.1.53
Mospan, N. (2022). Teaching emotional English intonation. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 2, 45–51. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2022.2.5
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1999). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 49 (1), 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00021
Pennington, M. C., & Richards, J. C. (1986). Pronunciation revisited. TESOL Quarterly, 20 (2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586541
Pickering, L. (2004). The structure and function of intonational paragraphs in native and nonnative speaker instructional discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 23 (1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00032-6
Setter, J., & Jenkins, J. (2005). Pronunciation. Language Teaching, 38 (1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444805002545
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second-language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 (1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060013
Wennerstrom, A. (2001). The music of everyday speech: Prosody and discourse analysis. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195143218.001.0001
Zhang, W., Chang, H., & Liao, Y. (2021). Effects of recasts, clarification requests on suprasegment development of English intonation. Porta Linguarum, 35, 311–325. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.v0i35.16949
Zhang, J. (2025). Integrating chatbot technology into English language learning to enhance student engagement and interactive communication skills. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 25 (3), 2288–2299. https://doi.org/10.1177/14727978241312992
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Анжеліка Буравенко, Ксенія Ткаченко, Олена Андрієнко, Єлизавета Кременицька

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
