PRINCIPAL’S ATTITUDE TO THE EXPANSION OF THE AUTONOMY OF THE INSTITUTION OF GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATION: THE RESULTS OF ANALYTICAL RESEARCH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2021.3.7

Keywords:

autonomy of general secondary education institutions, academic autonomy, financial autonomy, managerial competence of the head of a general secondary education institution, organizational autonomy, principal of educational institution, staff autonomy

Abstract

The authors of the article analyze the results of a survey of school principals conducted in December 2020 in Kyiv. The Law of Ukraine «On Education» provides for granting educational institutions the right to expand the scope of autonomy, namely – academic, organizational, personnel and financial autonomy. This process, among other things, depends on the level of readiness of the principals for self-government at school, the desire and ability to use the opportunities provided by the legislation of Ukraine.

The purpose of the article is to publish the results of a study to determine the current state of the attitude of the head of the capital's school to the implementation of the declared autonomy of the school and the factors that prevent it. Realization of the set purpose provides the following: definition of the relation of the head of school to introduction of the autonomy of educational institutions declared by the legislation; determining the readiness of the head of the school in the near future to begin implementing the autonomy of the educational institution; identification of conditions, the satisfaction of which will be able to accelerate the introduction of autonomy of educational institutions.

Participants in the survey «Autonomy of educational institutions and its impact on the quality of education management in the capital», conducted by the analytical center of Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University «OsvitAnalityka», were 472 principals of secondary schools and specialists of Kyiv education departments and the capital Department of Education and Science. This article presents an analytical review of the results of the survey of the heads of educational institutions in Kyiv, a statistical portrait of the school principals and the conclusions of the authors. Heads of schools in Kyiv support the ideas, possibilities of autonomy and introduce the autonomy of the educational institution with different speed, sequence of stages and a combination of components. The main conditions for the implementation of the autonomy of educational institutions, laid down by domestic legislation, leaders consider the following: development of an algorithm of actions for introduction of autonomy; training of school administration as educational managers; ensuring the appropriate level of current funding; deprivation of redundant functions of educational institutions; providing advisory assistance and developing a mechanism to encourage managers, etc.

Author Biographies

Kostiantyn Lynov, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 18/2 Bulvarno-Kudryavska Str., 04053 Kyiv, Ukraine

PhD in Public Administration, Associate Professor, Head of the Chair of Educational Leadership Department, Institute of In-Service Training

Iryna Lynova, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 18/2, Bulvarno-Kudryavska Str., 04053 Kyiv, Ukraine

PhD in Pedagogy, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Historical and Civic Education Department, Institute of In-Service Training

References

Закон України «Про освіту». 2017. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text (дата звернення: 1.10.2021).

Закон України «Про повну загальну середню освіту». 2020. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/463-20#Text (дата звернення: 1.10.2021).

Линьов К., Редько С. Автономія закладів освіти та її вплив на якість управління освітою столиці: звіт за результати аналітичного дослідження. Київ: Київський університет імені Бориса Грінченка, 2021. 44 с.

Сеїтосманов А., Фасоля О., Мархлєвскі В. Автономія як шлях до ефективного менеджменту школи. Методичні рекомендації. Київ: Міністерство освіти і науки України, 2019. 47 c.

Управління освітою та шкільна автономія: погляд зі школи: аналітична доповідь / За заг. ред. Паращенко Л. І. Київ: 2UP, 2013. 64 c.

Boudreaux M. K. Principals’ Dispositions Regarding Their Autonomy in Site-Based School Management. National forum of educational administration and supervision journal. 2017.Vol. 35. № 4. P. 1–15.

Göksoy S. How autonomous should schools be? Research based on teacher opinions. International Journal of Human Sciences. 2016. № 13 (1). Р. 582–591. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v13i1.3553

Gunnarsson V., Orazem P. F., Sánchez M., Verdisco A. Does School Decentralization Raise Student Outcomes? Theory and Evidence on the Roles of School Autonomy and Community Participation. Ames, IA: Iowa State University, 2004. 36 р.

Hashim A. K., Bush-Mecenas S., Strunk K. O. & Marsh J. A. Inside the black box of school autonomy: how diverse school providers use autonomy for school improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1863433

Limon I., Aydin B. School Principals’ Opinions on Autonomy in School Administration. Sakarya University Journal of Education. 2020. № 10 (3). Р. 459–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.648585

Mizrav E. Could principal autonomy produce better schools? Evidence from the schools and staffing survey. Master’s thesis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, 2014. 36 p.

Pilton J. W. International Trends in Principal Autonomy. Doctor’s thesis. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University, 2015. 154 р.

Zakon Ukrainy «Pro osvitu» [The Law of Ukraine On Education] (2017). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19

Zakon Ukrayiny «Pro povnu zahalnu serednyu osvitu» [The Law of Ukraine On complete general secondary education] (2020). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/463-20#Text

Lynjov, K., Redjko S. (2021). Avtonomija zakladiv osvity ta jiji vplyv na jakistj upravlinnja osvitoju stolyci: zvit za rezuljtaty analitychnogho doslidzhennja [Autonomy of educational institutions and its influence on the quality of education management in the capital: a report on the results of analytical research]. Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University.

Sejitosmanov, A., Fasolja, O., Markhljevski, V. (2019). Avtonomija jak shljakh do efektyvnogho menedzhmentu shkoly. Metodychni rekomendaciji [Autonomy as a way to effective school management. Guidelines]. Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrayiny.

Parashhenko, L. I. (Ed.) (2013). Upravlinnja osvitoju ta shkiljna avtonomija: poghljad zi shkoly: analitychna dopovid [Education management and school autonomy: a view from school: an analytical report]. 2UP.

Boudreaux, M. K. (2017). Principals’ Dispositions Regarding Their Autonomy in Site-Based School Management. National forum of educational administration and supervision journal, 35 (4), 1–15.

Göksoy, S. (2016). How autonomous should schools be? Research based on teacher opinions. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13 (1), 582–591. http://dx.doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v13i1.3553

Gunnarsson, V., Orazem, P. F., Sánchez, M., Verdisco, A. (2004). Does School Decentralization Raise Student Outcomes? Theory and Evidence on the Roles of School Autonomy and Community Participation. Iowa State University.

Hashim, A. K., Bush-Mecenas, S., Strunk, K. O. & Marsh, J. A. (2021). Inside the black box of school autonomy: how diverse school providers use autonomy for school improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1863433

Limon, İ., & Aydın, B. (2020). School Principals’ Opinions on Autonomy in School Administration. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 10 (3), 459–484. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.648585

Mizrav, E. (2014). Could principal autonomy produce better schools? Evidence from the schools and staffing survey. Master’s thesis. Georgetown University.

Pilton, J. W. (2015). International Trends in Principal Autonomy. Doctor’s thesis. Lehigh University.

Published

2021-10-31

How to Cite

Lynov, K., & Lynova, I. (2021). PRINCIPAL’S ATTITUDE TO THE EXPANSION OF THE AUTONOMY OF THE INSTITUTION OF GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATION: THE RESULTS OF ANALYTICAL RESEARCH. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, (3), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2021.3.7

Issue

Section

PRACTICE OF CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION