literature lesson, lesson structure, learning technologies, technological approach


The article covers the issue of using a technological approach in the construction of literature lessons. The educational achievements in the sphere of the problem, modern possibilities of innovative educational technologies, and their role in a modeling of school literature lessons are analyzed.
The technology of the constructed scientific literature has been revealed, focusing on the reading ability of a teacher, his (her) cognitive activity in using modern pedagogical and information technologies.
Improving the effectiveness of teaching literature in a technological pedagogical process is associated with the formation of the teacher’s readiness to model a holistic system of lessons as an algorithm of step-by-step student-reader actions based on a deep understanding of lesson structure and logic, taking into account clear goals and objectives at each stage, rational use of time and modern technologies.
It is claimed that the introduction of modern information technologies in the study of fiction at school has a positive impact on the perception of works of previous eras, bridges the gap in time, increases interest in literature and a teacher-innovator, increases the level of modern literary education. Therefore, the technological lesson is a clear algorithm that provides a systematic way of its construction, connects general didactic, methodical and artistic aspects of the lesson, acts as an indicator of its modernity and efficiency.
The article indicates the typical disadvantages of introducing modern technologies by teachers and the construction of a lesson based on a technological approach. The author draws attention to the main contradiction in the work of linguists – a misunderstanding of the difference between a technologically structured lesson and a lesson with technology warns against literal technologicalization in the work of a teacher of philology.

Author Biography

Galina Ostrovska, Ivano-Frankivsk Regional Institute of Postgraduate Teacher Education, 3 Mickiewicz Square, 76018, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and Methods of Learning


Cochran-Smith, M . & Villegas, A.М. (2015). Studying teacher preparation: The questions that drive research. European Educational Research Journal, 14 (5), 379–394.

Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C. & Sandholtz, J. H. (1991). Changes in Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in Technology-Rich Classrooms. Educational Leadership, 48 (8), 45–52.

Fenwick, T. & Edwards, R. (2016). Exploring the impact of digital technologies on professional responsibilities and education. European Educational Research Journal, 15 (1), 117–131. URL: full/10.1177/1474904115608387 Joseph, J. (2012). The Barriers of Using Education Technology for Optimizing the Educational Experience of Learners.

Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 427–436. 10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2012.11.051 Sherry, L., Billig, S., Tavalin, F. & Gibson, D. (2000). New insights on technology adoption in schools. T.H.E. Journal, 27 (7), 43–46. Smith, E. E., Kahlke, R. & Judd, T. (2020). Not just digital natives: Integrating technologies in professional education contexts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36 (3), 1–14.

Wilson, B., Sherry, L., Dobrovolny, J., Batty, M., & Ryder, M. (2001). Adoption of learning technologies in schools and universities. In H. H. Adelsberger, B. Collis, & J. M. Pawlowski (Eds.), Handbook on information technologies for education & training. Springer-Verlag.

Betsenko, T. (2017). Vidi analizu hudozhnogo tekstu [Types analysis of literary text]. Visnyk of Lviv University. Series Philology, 64 (ІІ), 239–244.

Vitchenko, A. O. (2013). Suchasni pidxody do texnologizaciyi vyshhoyi osvity [The modern approaches of technologization of the higher education]. Vijskova osvita, 1, 48–58.

Zolochevska, M., Elkin, O. & Paschenko, M. (2013). Internet-servisi yak instrumenti formuvannya kompetentnostej 21 stolittya [Internet services as a tool of 21st century]. New Information Technology in Education for all: lifelong learning (ITEA-2013), Kiev, 26–27 november. 42–46. Marynovska, O. Ya. (2014). Integrovane navchannya: texnologichnyj aspekt [Integrated learning: technological aspect]. Ridna shkola, 4–5, 32–36.

Marynovska, O. Ya. (2019). Pedagogichna innovatyka & Menedzhment innovacij [Pedagogichna innovatika & Menedzhment innovacij]. Misto NV.

Miroshnychenko, L. F. (2000). Metodyka vykladannya svitovoyi literatury v serednix navchalnyx zakladax [Methods of teaching world literature in secondary schools]. Lenvit.

Onkovich, H. V. (2020). Rozvitok mediadidaktiki vishoyi shkoli: ukrayinskij dosvid [Development of higher education media didactics: Ukrainian experience]. Obriyi drukarstva, 1 (8), 130–150.

Ostrovska, G. O. (2017). Formuvannya profesijnoyi gotovnosti majbutnih uchiteliv zarubizhnoyi literaturi do vivchennya biografiyi pismennikiv u zagalnoosvitnij shkoli [Forming of future Foreign Literature Teachers’ Professional Readiness for the Study of Writers’ Biographies at Comprehensive School]. Symphony forte.

Sytchenko, А. (2011). Estetychne vyxovannya u konteksti texnologizovanogo navchannya literatury [Aesthetic education in the context of technological teaching of literature]. Ukrayinska literatura v zagalnoosvitnij shkoli, 9, 2–4.

Sytchenko, А. (2020). Literaturna osvita shkoljariv u vyklykakh kompetentnisnogho navchannja [Literary education of schoolchildren in the challenges of competence learning]. Osvitologhichnyj dyskurs, 2 (29). 51–63. https://doi. org/10.28925/2312-5829.2020.2.5.

Shuldyk, V. I. (2012). Texnologichnyj pidxid pry vykladanni pryrodoznavchyh dyscyplin u pedvuzi [Technological approach in teaching natural sciences in the university]. PP Zhovtyj.




How to Cite

Ostrovska, G. (2020). THE TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE STUDYING OF LITERATURE IN SCHOOL. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, (3), 24–30.