Consequences of “No child left behind act” pressure: the USA experience for Ukrainian educators
Keywords:
academic standards, consequences of monitoring, general education, monitoring results, monitoring quality of education, quality of education, NCLB Act.Abstract
The article presents desirable and unpredictable consequences of implementation No Child Left Behind Act (2001, USA) for monitoring quality of general education. NCLB Act pressure on a state, school district, school and students are investigated. The ways of using the results of monitoring quality of general education in the USA are shown. Possible consequences of monitoring realization - positive and negative, state foundation of such monitoring and its effectiveness are analyzed. The consequences of keeping the high academic standards and students educational progress are searched.The aspects of the educational monitoring that should be taken into account and analyzed for practical application in Ukraine are presented.
References
Amrein-Beardsley Audrey. The Unintended, Pernicious Consequences of “Staying the Course” on the United States` No Child Left Behind Policy / Audrey Amrein-Beardsley / International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership. – 2009. – Vol. 4. - № 6. (eng.)
Аndriushyna O.V. Legal state framework of monitoring quality of general education in the USA / O.V.Andriushyna // Мolodoy uchieniy. – 2014. - № 3. – С.867-869. (eng.)
Andriushyna O.V. Strategiyi ispolzovaniya rezyltatov monitoringa kachestva srednego obrazovaniya na regionalnom urovne v SSA / О.V. Аndriushyna // «Nauchnaya dyskussiya: voprosy pedagogyky i psyhologiyi»: materialy IX mezhdunarodnoy zaochnoy nauchno-practicheskoy konferentsiyi. Chast I. (24 yanvarya 2013 г.) — Moskwa: Izd. «Mezhdunarodniy tsentr nauki I obrazovaniya», 2013. — 164 с., С. 12-20; ISBN 978-5-905945-96-0. (rus.)
Dunn Karee, Mulvenon Sean. Let`s Talk Formative Assessment… and Evaluation?, 2009 / www.eric. ed.gov , ED505357. (eng.)
From English Language Learners to Emergent Bilinguals. Equity Matters / Garcia Ofelia, Kleifgen Jo Ann, Falchi Lorraine. Campaign for Educational Equity, Teachers College, Columbia University, 2008 // www.eric.ed.gov, ED524002. (eng.)
Helen Schneider and Ning Zhang, “School Accountability and Youth Obesity: Can Physical Education Mandates Make a Difference?,” Education Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 431979, 14 pages, 2013. doi:10.1155/2013/431979. (eng.)
Jeffrey M. Jones, In U.S., Private Schools Get Top Marks for Educating Children. August 29, 2012 //http://www.gallup.com/poll/156974/private-schools-top-marks-educating-children.aspx. (eng.)
Lips Dan. A Smaller Path to a “Race to the Top” in Educational Reform, 2012 // www.eric.ed.gov , ED509500. (eng.)
Hickok Eugene, Ladner Mathew. Reauthorization of No Child Left Behind: Federal Management or Citizen Ownership of K-12 Education? / Hickok Eugene, Ladner Mathew, 2007, www.eric.ed.gov . ED498010. (eng.)
State Standards and Student Growth: Why State Standards Don`t Matter as Much as We Thought / Dahlin Michael, Xiang Yan, Durant Sarah, Cronin John. – Northwest Evaluation Association, 2010, www.eric.ed.gov. ED521964. (eng.)
The Consequences of MCAS Exit Examinations for Struggling Low-Income Urban Students / John P. Papay, Richard J. Murnane, John B. Willett. – Harvard Graduate School of Education, July 2008 //http://www.doe.mass.edu/research/reports/0708papay-murnane-willett.doc
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 О. Andriushyna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
