ATTITUDES OF EDUCATIONAL PROCESS PARTICIPANTS TOWARDS THE EVALUATION OF TEACHERS' PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2025.2.13

Keywords:

feedback, formative assessment model, professional activity of teachers, student assessment of teacher effectiveness.

Abstract

The article examines the results of a study of the views of high school students and teachers on the component of the formative assessment model based on observations of the teacher's activities, namely, the assessment of the teacher's professional activity by participants in the educational process. This assessment method is extremely important and can be used by the teacher himself for self-improvement based on feedback. The results of the study made it possible to analyze the respondents' answers by the degree of their commonality and differences and to understand the attitude of participants in the educational process to the assessment of pedagogical activity by students. High school students called the achievements and personal development of students and the attitude of students towards the teacher as indicators of the effective professional activity of a teacher. Most students would like to evaluate the work of teachers, but they believe that their assessment will not be important for professional activity and will not affect the effectiveness of teachers' work. The vast majority of teachers are also convinced that the opinion of students is important for their professional activity, but it will not affect their work. That is, both students and teachers consider the assessment of pedagogical activity by students to be important. But they are unanimous in the fact that its results will not affect professional activity. Student assessment of teachers' professional activity in the domestic educational system has not gained widespread use and is fragmentary. This article is a continuation of scientific research into ways to improve the system of evaluating the professional activities of teachers in secondary education institutions.

References

Vaschenko, L. (2024). Ocinyuvannya profesijnoyi diyalnosti pedagogichnih kadriv: vitchiznyanij ta zarubizhnij dosvid [Assessment of the Professional Activity of Pedagogical Personnel: Domestic and Foreign Experience]. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 3 (80), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-0774.2024.3.12

Derzhavna sluzhba yakosti osviti Ukrayini: yak i dlya chogo direktorovi shkoli vimiryuvati yakist osviti. Proyekt «Suprovid uryadovih reform v Ukrayini» (SURGe) 2020–2023 [The State Service of Education Quality of Ukraine: how and why a school principal should measure the quality of education. Project “Support for Government Reforms in Ukraine” (SURGe) 2020–2023]. https://sqe.gov.ua/yakist-osvity-silski-shkoly-2021/

Rakov, S. (2018). Potencial ocinyuvannya kompetentisnih pokaznikiv yakosti roboti vchitelya na osnovi tehnologij socialnoyi merezhi shkil [The potential for evaluation of the competence quality indices of the teachers work at the base of the schools social network technologies]. Educational Analytics of Ukraine, 1 (2), 63–69. https://science.iea.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/63_70_Rakov-1.pdf

Yaroshenko, O. (2022). Rejtinguvannya studentami diyalnosti naukovo-pedagogichnih pracivnikiv yak instrument studentocentrovanogo navchannya [Students’ Rating of the Activities of Scientific and Pedagogical Workers as a Tool of Student-Centered Learning]. International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership, 13, 46–54. https://doi.org/10.31874/2520-6702-2022-13-46-54

Yasynova, S. (2007). Vchitel ochima uchniv [Teacher through the eyes of students]. Psychologist, 7, 27–28.

Basow, S. A., & Montgomery, S. (2005). Student ratings and professor self-ratings of college teaching: Effects of gender and divisional affiliation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18 (2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-006-9001-8

Irving, S. E. (2004). The development and validation of a student evaluation instrument to identify highly accomplished mathematics teachers. PhD in Education Thesis. University of Auckland.

Ironside, R. A. (1988). Student evaluation of teachers. Master of Arts in Education Thesis. University of Northern Iowa. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/grp/2583

Learning about Teaching: Initial Findings from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project. Report (2009). Bill& Melinda Gates Foundation. https://usprogram.gatesfoundation.org/news-and-insights/usp-resource-center/resources/learning-about-teaching-initial-findings-from-the-measures-of-effective-teaching-project--report

Machisi, E. (2023). Secondary school mathematics teaching evaluations by students: A report card for the mathematics teacher. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19 (1). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12774

McPherson, M., Jewell, R. & Kim, M. (2009). What determines student evaluation scores? A random effects analysis of undergraduate economics classes. Eastern Economic Journal, 35 (1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eej.9050042

Mengel, F., Sauermann, J., & Zölitz, U. (2018). Gender bias in teaching evaluations. Journal of the European Economic Association, 17 (2), 535–566. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvx057

Ogbonnaya, U. I. (2019). The reliability of students’ evaluation of teaching at secondary school level. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 77 (1). https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/19.77.97

Peterson, K., Wahlquist, C., & Bone, K. (2000). Student surveys for school teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14 (2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008102519702

Rupley, W. (1974). Student evaluation of reading teachers. Journal of Reading, 18 (3), 269–271. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40009985

Thompson, J. E. (1974). Student Evaluation of Teachers. NASSP Bulletin, 58 (384), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263657405838404

Rupp, M. T. (2023). A Critical Look at Student Evaluations of Teaching. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 87 (10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100136

Wisener, K., Driessen, E., Tan, A. et al. (2025). From constructive to critical and everywhere in between: education leaders’ decision-making related to harsh feedback from learners about their teachers. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 30, 497–513 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10367-7

Published

2025-06-26

How to Cite

Vashchenko, L. . (2025). ATTITUDES OF EDUCATIONAL PROCESS PARTICIPANTS TOWARDS THE EVALUATION OF TEACHERS’ PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 83(2), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2025.2.13

Issue

Section

PRACTICE OF CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION