CRITERIA AND INDICATORS FOR EVALUATING THE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY OF BIOLOGY TEACHERS OF GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2025.1.7

Keywords:

biology teacher, communication skills, evaluation of teacher’s pedagogical activity, evaluation criteria, evaluation indicators, methodological skills, professional competence of biology teachers.

Abstract

This study identifies criteria for evaluating the pedagogical activity of biology teachers in secondary education institutions: informational, subject-based, methodological, motivational, self-educational, learning effectiveness, and self-assessment ability. Indicators have been developed for each of them, which include the main essential features of the criterion. The results of a study of the attitude of biology teachers, as an object of evaluation, to the proposed criteria and evaluation indicators are highlighted. The data were collected using an online survey. It was found that teachers who participated in the survey preferred communicative, subject-based, and methodological criteria for evaluating pedagogical activity. Motivational and informational criteria were underestimated, which took the last two places in the rating of assessments. The results of the study made it possible to draw conclusions about the need to use an integrated approach to assessment when assessing pedagogical skills, when not only the result of pedagogical work is evaluated, but also the process of pedagogical activity itself. This explains the need for further research into the need to move from the practice of assessing general qualities to assessing the components of a teachers’ pedagogical skills when evaluating a teacher’s work.

References

Byrka, M. F. (2017). Teoretiko-metodichni osnovi pobudovi kriterialnoyi bazi dlya ocinyuvannya rivnya profesijnogo rozvitku vchiteliv prirodnicho-matematichnih disciplin [Theoretical and methodological foundations of building a criterion base for assessing the level of professional development of teachers of natural and mathematical disciplines]. Naukovi zapiski Kirovogradskogo derzhavnogo pedagogichnogo universitetu imeni Volodimira Vinnichenka. Seriya: Pedagogichni nauki, 156, 29–35. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nz_p_2017_156_5

Vaschenko, L. (2024). Ocinyuvannya profesijnoyi diyalnosti pedagogichnih kadriv: vitchiznyanij ta zarubizhnij dosvid [Assessment of the professional activity of pedagogical personnel: domestic and foreign experience]. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 3 (80), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-0774.2024.3.12

Derzhavnij standart profilnoyi serednoyi osviti. Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayini vid 25 lipnya 2024 r. № 851 [State Standard of Specialized Secondary Education. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated July 25, 2024, No. 851]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/851-2024-%D0%BF#Text

Kremen, V. H. (Ed.) (2021). Enciklopediya osviti [Encyclopedia of education]. Yurinkom Inter.

Zhuk, Ю., & Vashchenko, L. (2024). Ocinyuvannya pedagogichnoyi diyalnosti vchiteliv: pilotne doslidzhennya [Evaluation of Teachers’ Pedagogical Activity: Pilot Study]. Ukrainian Educational Journal, 3, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2024-3-52-65

Zakon Ukrainy «Pro vyshchu osvitu» [Law of Ukraine On Higher Education] (2014). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18

Zakon Ukrainy «Pro osvitu» [Law of Ukraine On Education] (2017). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text

Ivanova, S. V. (2010). Kriteriyi ta pokazniki rozvitku profesijnoyi kompetentnosti vchiteliv biologiyi v zakladah pislyadiplomnoyi pedagogichnoyi osviti [Criteria and indicators of the development of professional competence of biology teachers in institutions of postgraduate pedagogical education]. Visnik Zhitomirskogo derzhavnogo universitetu imeni Ivana Franka, 52, 152–156. http://eprints.zu.edu.ua/4463/

Levrints, M. (2019). Umovi efektivnosti profesijnoyi diyalnosti vchiteliv u SShA [Teacher Effectiveness Factors in the USA]. Collection of Scientific Papers of Uman State Pedagogical University, 3, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.31499/2307-4906.3.2019.190339

Lynnyk, Yu. (2013). Struktura ta sposobi ocinki rivnya rozvitku profesijnoyi kompetentnosti vchiteliv prirodnichih specialnostej [Structure and methods of assessing the level of development of professional competence of teachers of natural sciences]. Gumanitarnij visnik Derzhavnogo vishogo navchalnogo zakladu «Pereyaslav-Hmelnickij derzhavnij pedagogichnij universitet imeni G. S. Skovorodi», 28 (2), 170–177.

Pro deyaki pitannya zdijsnennya oglyadu (kontrolyu) u sferi zagalnoyi serednoyi osviti». Nakaz MON vid 30.04.2021 roku [On some issues of conducting an inspection (control) in the field of general secondary education. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated April 30, 2021]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0809-21#Text

Ryabchenko, S. (2016). Kriteriyi viznachennya rivniv sformovanosti profesijnoyi kompetentnosti majbutnih vchiteliv biologiyi [Criteria for determining the levels of professional competence of future biology teachers]. Тhe Sources of Pedagogical Skills, 18, 297–301. http://dspace.pnpu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/7730

Bellido-García, R. S., Venturo-Orbegoso, C. O., Cruzata-Martínez, A., Sarmiento-Villanueva, E. B., Corro-Quispe, J., & Rejas-Borjas, L. G. (2024). Involvement of the student in their learning: Effects of formative assessment on competency development. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20 (5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14453

Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2013). Okul yцnetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. Pegem Akademi.

Carlson, J. et al. (2019). The Refined Consensus Model of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, A. Borowski (Еds.), Repositioning Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Teachers’ Knowledge for Teaching Science (pp. 77–94). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_2

Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Getting teacher evaluation right. Teachers College Press.

Dávila Ramírez, J. R, Huertas Martínez, J. A. (2024). Formative evaluation and quality of feedback: design and validation of scales for school teachers. Educación XX1, 27 (2), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.38283

Flores, M. A. & Derrington, M. L. (2017). School principals’ views of teacher evaluation policy: lessons learned from two empirical studies, International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20 (4), 416–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1094144

Großmann, L., Krüger, D. (2024). Assessing the quality of science teachers’ lesson plans: Evaluation and application of a novel instrument. Science Education, 108 (1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21832

Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2016). Ein Blick in die Black-Box. Wie der Zusammenhang von Unterrichtsenthusiasmus und Unterrichtshandeln bei angehenden Lehrkräften erklärt werden kann. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 48 (2), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000150

Konan, N., & Yılmaz, S. (2018). Teachers’ Views on Teacher Performance Assessment: A Mixed Method Research. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 47, 137–160. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/milliegitim/issue/39923/473428#article_cite

König, J., Bremerich‐Vos, A., Buchholtz, C., Fladung, I., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Pre‐service teachers’ generic and subjectspecific lesson‐planning skills: On learning adaptive teaching during initial teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1679115

Lane, R., Parrila, R., Bower, M… Skrebneva, I. (2019). Formative Assessment Evidence and Practice: Literature Review. AITSL.

Maxwell, J. A. (2016). Expanding the history and range of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10 (1) 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815571

Mutton, T., Hagger, H., & Burn, K. (2011). Learning to plan, planning to learn: The developing expertise of beginning teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 17 (4), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.580516

Necdet KONAN, Salih YILMAZ. Millо Eğitim Sayı 219 Yaz/201 2018 This study was submitted as oral presentation at 26th International Educational Sciences Congress in Antalya between 20-23

Pohlmann, M. (2019). Förderung ethischer Bewertungskompetenz: Der Einfluss ausgewählter Lerngelegenheit auf die inhaltliche Ausdifferenzierung und die Kohärenz der Komponenten des fachdidaktischen Wissens von Biologielehrkräften. Oldenburger Online-Publikations-Server.

Rodríguez Rincón, Y., Munárriz, A., Magreñán Ruiz, A. (2024), A new approach to continuous assessment: Moving from a stressful sum of grades to meaningful learning through self-reflection. International Journal of Management Education, 22 (3), 101072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101072

Zaragoza, A., Seidel, T., & Hiebert, J. (2021). Exploring preservice teachers’ abilities to connect professional knowledge with lesson planning and observation. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47 (1), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1996558

Zaragoza, A., Seidel, T., & Santagata, R. (2023). Lesson analysis and plan template: Scaffolding preservice teachers’ application of professional knowledge to lesson planning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 55 (2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2182650

Published

2025-03-28

How to Cite

Vashchenko, L. . (2025). CRITERIA AND INDICATORS FOR EVALUATING THE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY OF BIOLOGY TEACHERS OF GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 82(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2025.1.7

Issue

Section

PRACTICE OF CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION