UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY – A SUFFICIENT OR NECESSARY CONDITION FOR THE QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION? EXPERIENCE OF EDUCATIONAL DEBATES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-0774.2024.2.11Keywords:
academic autonomy, debate, educational technology, financial autonomy, organizational autonomy, quality of higher education, staffing autonomy, university autonomy, universities’ social responsibility.Abstract
The article is dedicated to presenting the experience of conducting debates on the impact of university autonomy on the improvement of higher education quality. It emphasizes that university autonomy is a fundamental academic value and a strategic direction of development for the European Higher Education Area, as well as a key feature of a democratic society and a condition for enhancing the quality of higher education and research. Debates are characterized as an educational technology and their role in the development of professional and general competencies of third-level (educational-scientific level) higher education seekers, enhancing the level of communication skills and interactive ability for partnership interaction, teamwork skills, as well as affirming democratic values, tolerance, honesty, and respect for opponents. The arguments presented by members of the affirmation team during the debates demonstrated that university autonomy in all four dimensions (organizational, personnel, financial, and academic) allows for the creation of a self-regulated and authoritative environment conducive to improving the quality of higher education, and also obliges universities to bear responsibility to society, as they play a key role in the development of a democratic and inclusive society, sustainable and environmentally safe economic and social development, in the development of the economy and improvement of living standards. In contrast, the opposing team argued the possibilities of centralized regulation by the state in enhancing the quality of higher education and in the implementation of universities’ social responsibility.
References
Ananyan, E. L. (2023). Debati yak interaktivna pedagogichna tehnologiya u procesi navchannya inozemnoyi movi [Debate as an interactive pedagogical technology in the process of learning a foreign language]. In The 1st International scientific and practical conference «Science and society: modern trends in a changing world» (December 18–20, 2023) (pp. 290–296). MDPC Publishing.
Bulvinska, O. (2024). Modeli universitetskoyi avtonomiyi v krayinah YeS: komparativnij analiz [Models of University Autonomy in EU Countries: Comparative Analysis]. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 1 (78), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2024.1.12
Verbytska, Kh. I., Kuzo, L. I. (2021). Formuvannya inshomovnoyi komunikativnoyi kompetentnosti majbutnih pravoohoronciv za dopomogoyu metodu tematichnih onlajn-debativ [Formation of Foreign Language Communicative Competence of Future Law Enforcement Officers Using the Method of Thematic Online Debates]. Innovative Pedagogy, 42, 130–134. https://doi.org/10.32843/2663- 6085/2021/42.26
Debati: Navchalnij posibnik: Metodichni rekomendaciyi shodo vedennya debativ [Debate: Study guide: Methodical recommendations for conducting debates] (2001). A.P.N.
Dehtiarova, K., Karas, A., Zhyvolup, V., Kibenko, L. (2021). Zastosuvannya metodu debativ pid chas navchannya inozemnoyi movi za profesijnim spryamuvannyam yak odnogo iz zasobiv rozvitku komunikativnih navichok studentiv [Application of Debate Method in Teaching of Foreign Language for Specific Purposes as One of the Approaches of Communicative Skill Development in Students]. International Humanitarian University Herald. Philology, 47 (1), 64–67.
Slodynytska, Yu., Hudyma, H. (2023). Rozvitok kritichnogo mislennya v suchasnij pedagogici: strategiyi, metodi ta vikliki [Development of critical thinking in modern pedagogy: strategies, methods and challenges]. Scientific Collection «InterConf», 160, 91–94.
Khanykina, N., Sopova, D., Bulvinska, O. (2021). Vprovadzhennya principiv akademichnoyi dobrochesnosti v universiteti: dosvid provedennya osvitologichnih debativ [Implementation of the academic integrity principles at the university: experience of conducting educological debates]. Continuing professional education: theory and practice, 1 (66), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2021.1.6
Shevelova-Garkusha, N. (2023). Debati yak osoblivij vid interaktivnogo navchannya dlya vdoskonalennya komunikativnoyi kompetenciyi studentiv na zanyattyah z anglijskoyi movi [Debates as a special type of interactive learning for improving students’ communicative competence in English classes]. In Materiali V Mizhnarodnoyi naukovo-praktichnoyi internet-konferenciyi «Problemi ta perspektivi rozvitku suchasnoyi nauki v krayinah Yevraziyi» (pp. 86–87). Hryhorii Skovoroda University in Pereiaslav.
Bergan, S., Gallagher, T., Harkavy, I. (Eds.) (2020). Academic freedom, institutional autonomy and the future of democracy. Council of Europe. Higher Education Series, 24, 141–153. https://rm.coe.int/prems-025620-eng-2508-higher-education-series-no-24/1680a19fdf
Bulvinska, O. (2017). Teacher communicative competence: different theoretical approaches. International scientific journal «Internauka», 15 (37), 1, 20–23.
Chen X., Zhai X., Zhu Yu., Li Y. (2022). Exploring debaters and audiences’ depth of critical thinking and its relationship with their participation in debate activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101035
Chen, X., Zhao, H., Jin, H., Li, Y. (2022). Exploring college students’ depth and processing patterns of critical thinking skills and their perception in argument map (AM)-supported online group debate activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101467
DeWitt, D., Alias, N., & Siraj, S. (2015). Collaborative learning: Interactive debates using padlet in a higher education institution. In International Educational Technology Conference (IETC 2015), 27–29 May 2015, Istanbul, Turkey. http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/13630
Estermann, T., Nokkala, T. (2009). University Autonomy in Europe I: Exploratory Study. European University Association. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/408:university-autonomy-in-europe-i-exploratory-study%C2%A0.html
Estermann, T., Bennetot Pruvot, E. (2018). Institutional Autonomy in Higher Education. In P. Teixeira, J. Shin (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1
Meschi, M., Shirahmadi, S., Amiri, M., Ebrahimi-Siaghi, N. (2024). Debating: effective and satisfactory learning method in dentistry. BMC Medical Education, 24, 307. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05286-5
Park, C., Kier, C., Jugdev, K. (2011). Debate as a Teaching Strategy in Online Education: A Case Study. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 37 (3). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2FW2R
Rodriguez-Dono, A, Hernández-Fernández, A. (2021). Fostering Sustainability and Critical Thinking through Debate – A Case Study. Sustainability, 13 (11), 6397. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116397
Rome communiqué (2020). https://erasmusplus.org.ua/novyny/3131-bologna-conference-in-rome-19-nov-2020.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Оксана Бульвінська
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
