UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: RESULTS OF THE TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION IMPACT RANKINGS 2022

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2022.4.8

Keywords:

university autonomy; rankings; sustainable development; Times Higher Education Impact Rankings; university social responsibility.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the results of the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings 2022, which reflects the activities of universities in ensuring the sustainable development. It is emphasized that the autonomy of universities, along with the possibilities of governance and academic freedom, strengthens their social responsibility for the results of their activities in achieving the goals of sustainable development. One of the mechanisms for evaluating the contribution of universities to ensuring sustainable development is the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings, participation in which is voluntary for higher education institutions. The article analyzes the methodology of the ranking, notes its strengths and gaps. The positive sides of the methodology are openness for universities to be widely involved in the ranking on a voluntary basis, the opportunity for universities to expand their contribution to solving social, political, ecological, economic issues in their country and around the world; certain flexibility of the criteria allows to compare a very diverse environment of higher education institutions. Gaps in the methodology of the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings include the optional participation of universities in the ranking, which leads to the absence of most universities in the world, in particular those that are top according to other rankings; a certain imbalance in the weighting factors of the ranking criteria, the impossibility of longitudinal analysis of university achievements. It was emphasized that a statistical study of the results of the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings 2022 testified to the high achievements of universities from Europe, Australia, and North America, as well as an increase in the ranking of the share of higher education institutions from developing regions.

References

Список використаної літератури

Курбатов С. Моделі університетської освіти ХХІ століття крізь призму провідних міжнародних рейтингів. Вища освіта України. 2013. № 3. С. 103–110.

Луговий В. І., Слюсаренко О. М., & Таланова, Ж. В. Вимірювання якості діяльності університетів через участь у світових (Shanghai, Times, QS) та національному рейтингах: За матеріалами доповіді на X Міжнародній науково-практичній конференції «Європейська інтеграція вищої освіти України в контексті Болонського процесу. Оцінювання якості: підходи та інструменти» 10 листопада 2021 р. Вісник Національної академії педагогічних наук України. 2021. № 3 (2). С. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37472/2707-305X-2021-3-2-3-5

Рябченко В. Соціально відповідальна взаємодія університетів та суспільства у вимірах сталого розвитку: теоретико-методологічні засади. Неперервна професійна освіта: теорія і практика. 2022. № 1. С. 38–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2022.1.4

Слюсаренко О. Розвиток найвищого університетського потенціалу в умовах глобалізації: монографія. Київ: Пріоритети, 2015. 384 с.

Червона Л., Бульвінська О. Соціальна відповідальність університетів: аксіологічні аспекти. Collection of scientific papers ΛΌГOΣ. 2021. № 2. С. 181–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-26.02.2021.v2

Bautista-Puig N., Orduña-Malea E. Perez-Esparrells C. Enhancing sustainable development goals or promoting universities? An analysis of the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2022. Vol. 23. № 8. Р. 211–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2021-0309

Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions. 2006. https://www.ihep.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/uploads_docs_pubs_berlinprinciplesranking.pdf (дата звернення: 29.11.2022).

Calderon A. Why SDG-focused impact rankings need to be contextualized. University World News. 28 April 2021. URL: www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=2021042815055074 (дата звернення: 29.11.2022).

Caputo F., Ligorio L., Pizzi S. The Contribution of Higher Education Institutions to the SDGs – An Evaluation of Sustainability Reporting Practices. Administrative Sciences. 2021. № 11. Art. 97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030097

Chankseliani M., McCowan T. Higher education and the sustainable development goals. Higher Education. 2021. № 8 (1). Р. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00652-w

Estermann Th. & Nokkala T. University autonomy in Europe I. Exploratory study. Brussels: European University Association, 2009. 48 р.

Gadd E. University rankings need a rethink. Nature. 2020. Vol. 587. № 7835. Р. 523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03312-2

Galleli B., Teles N. E. B., Santos J. A. R. d., Freitas-Martins M. S., Hourneaux Junior F. Sustainability university rankings: a comparative analysis of UI green metric and the times higher education world university rankings. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2022. № 23 (2). Р. 404–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-12-2020-0475

Times Higher Education Impact Rankings 2022. URL: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/impactrankings (дата звернення:

Torabian J. Revisiting global university rankings and their indicators in the age of sustainable development. Sustainability: The Journal of Record. 2019. № 12 (3). Р. 167–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/sus.2018.0037

References

Kurbatov, S. (2013). Modeli universitetskoyi osviti XXI stolittya kriz prizmu providnih mizhnarodnih rejtingiv [Models of University of the 21st Century Through the Lenses of Main International University Rankings]. Higher education of Ukraine, 3, 103–110.

Lugovyi, V., Sliusarenko, O., & Talanova, Z. (2021). Measuring the quality of universities activity by participation in the world (Shanghai, Times, QS) and national rankings: Based on the report at the 10th International Scientific and Practical Conference «European Integration of Higher Education of Ukraine in the Context of the Bologna Process. Quality Assessment: Approaches and Tools», November 10, 2021. Herald of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, 3 (2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.37472/2707-305X-2021-3-2-3-5

Riabchenko, V. (2022). Socialno vidpovidalna vzayemodiya universitetiv ta suspilstva u vimirah stalogo rozvitku: teoretiko-metodologichni zasadi [Socially responsible cooperation between universities and society in the dimensions of sustainable development: theoretical and methodological principles]. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 1, 38–48. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2022.1.4

Sliusarenko, O. (2015). Rozvitok najvishogo universitetskogo potencialu v umovah globalizaciyi: monografiya [Development of the highest university potential in the conditions of globalization: monograph]. Priorities.

Chervona, L., Bulvinska, O. (2021). Socialna vidpovidalnist universitetiv: aksiologichni aspekti [Social responsibility of universities: axiological aspects]. Collection of scientific papers ΛΌГOΣ, 2, 181–183. https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-26.02.2021.v2

Bautista-Puig, N., Orduña-Malea, E. and Perez-Esparrells, C. (2022). Enhancing sustainable development goals or promoting universities? An analysis of the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23 (8), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2021-0309

Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions (2006). https://www.ihep.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/uploads_docs_pubs_berlinprinciplesranking.pdf

Calderon, A. (2021, April 28). Why SDG-focused impact rankings need to be contextualized. University World News. www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=2021042815055074

Caputo, F., Ligorio, L., and Pizzi, S. (2021). The Contribution of Higher Education Institutions to the SDGs – An Evaluation of Sustainability Reporting Practices. Administrative Sciences, 11, 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030097

Chankseliani, M. and McCowan, T. (2021). Higher education and the sustainable development goals. Higher Education, 8 (1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00652-w

Estermann, Th. & Nokkala, T. (2009). University autonomy in Europe I. Exploratory study. European University Association.

Gadd, E. (2020). University rankings need a rethink. Nature, 587 (7835), 523. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03312-2

Galleli, B., Teles, N. E. B., Santos, J. A. R. d., Freitas-Martins, M. S. and Hourneaux Junior, F. (2022). Sustainability university rankings: a comparative analysis of UI Green Metric and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23 (2), 404–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-12-2020-0475

Times Higher Education Impact Rankings 2022. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/impactrankings

Torabian, J. (2019). Revisiting global university rankings and their indicators in the age of sustainable development. Sustainability: The Journal of Record, 12 (3), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1089/sus.2018.0037

Published

2022-12-24

How to Cite

Riabchenko, V., & Bulvinska, O. (2022). UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: RESULTS OF THE TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION IMPACT RANKINGS 2022. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 73(4), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2022.4.8

Issue

Section

UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY IN THE CONTEXT OF CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION: EU EXPERIENCE