THE VIEWS OF THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS ON THE STUDENTS’ SELF-EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2022.3.6Keywords:
evaluation, internal and external systems for ensuring the quality of education, self-evaluationAbstract
The article examines the significance of the formation of schoolchildren’s ability to self-assess the results of educational activities. Self-assessment is an important component of the educational process, which determines the child’s personality. According to the results of the survey of research participants, it is shown that teachers support the use of self-assessment of learning outcomes by schoolchildren. If the evaluation system is limited only to checking knowledge and skills in the subject, it does not provide an opportunity to develop critical thinking skills, form motivation for learning, and develop the ability of students to objectively evaluate their results. Regarding the negative results of using the student self-assessment method in the educational process, teachers say that students may have difficulties in self-assessment of their learning results and may not be ready for self-determination and self-recognition of their assessment. Attention was paid to students’ understanding of the importance of self-assessment of educational activities.
The results of the survey indicate a difference in the views of teachers and students on the formation of the ability to self- assess. Further research can be aimed at developing the internal system of quality assurance in educational institutions, evaluating its effectiveness, using methods of self-assessment of educational and management processes.
References
Гривко А. В., Ващенко Л. С. Поточне та формувальне оцінювання в базовій та старшій профільній школі. Український педагогічний журнал. 2021. № 2. С. 72–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2021-2-72-83
Гончаренко С. У. Український педагогічний енциклопедичний словник. Рівне: Волинські обереги, 2011. 552 с.
Енциклопедія освіти / В. Г. Кремень (ред.). Київ: Юрінком Інтер, 2008. 1037 с.
Закон України «Про освіту». 2017. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#n186 (дата звернення: 20.07.2022).
Кащенко О. В. Професійна самооцінка особистості: огляд стану проблеми в сучасних дослідженнях. Вісник КНУ ім. Т. Шевченка. Соціологія. Психологія. Педагогіка. 2007. № 27–28. С. 111–114.
Ковальчук В. А. Роль професійного самооцінювання майбутнього вчителя у структурі професійної діяльності. ScienceRise. 2015. № 7/1 (12). С. 42–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/2313-8416.2015.47229
Мовчан П. М. Великий тлумачний словник української мови. Київ: Просвіта, 2005. 1332 с.
Мурашко Н. Вчитель: Самооцінювання. Київ: Шкільний світ, 2007. 128 с.
Наказ Міністерства освіти і науки України № 1480 від 30.11.2020 р. «Про затвердження Методичних рекомендацій з питань формування внутрішньої системи забезпечення якості освіти у закладах загальної середньої освіти». URL: https://mon.gov.ua/ua/npa/pro-zatverdzhennya-metodichnih-rekomendacij-z-pitan-formuvannya-vnutrishnoyi-sistemi-zabezpechennya-yakosti-osviti-u-zakladah-zagalnoyi-serednoyi-osviti (дата звернення: 20.07.2022).
Acat B. & Demir E. Sınıf öğretmenlerinin ilköğretim programlarındaki değerlendirme süreçlerine ilişkin görüşleri. 16. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi 5–7 Eylül 2007. Tokat: Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, 2007.
Akçadağ T. Öğretmenlerin İlköğretim Programındaki Yöntem Teknik Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Konularına İlişkin Eğitim İhtiyaçları. Ahmet Yesevi Üniversitesi Bilig Dergisi. 2010. № 53. S. 29–50.
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Holl, 1986. 617 p.
Bahar M., Nartgün Z., Durmuş S. & Bıçak B. Geleneksel-Alternatif Ölçme Ve Değerlendirme Teknikleri Öğretmen El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık, 2006. 224 s.
Brown J. D. & Hudson T. The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly. 1998. № 32. P. 653–675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587999
Brown H. D. Language assessment: principles and classroom practices. New York: Pearson Education, 2004. 324 p.
Cansız-Aktaş M. Öğretmenlerin Yeni Ortaöğretim Matematik Öğretim Programının Ölçme Değerlendirme Boyutuna Bakışlarının İncelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Trabzon: Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2008.
Crocker J., Luhtanen R. K., Cooper M. L., Bouvrette A. Contingencies of Self_Worth in College Students: Theory and Measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003. Vol. 85 (5). P. 894–908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.894
Harris M. Self-Assessment of Language Learning in Formal Settings. ELT Journal. 1997. № 51 (1). P. 12–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.1.12
Kösterelioğlu İ., Çelen Ü. Öz Değerlendirme Yönteminin Etkililiğinin Değerlendirilmesi Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Self-Assessment Method. Elementary Education Online. 2016. № 15 (2). S. 671–681. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17051/io.2016.44304
Valdez Pierce L. Assessing English Language Learners. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 2003.
Ross J. A. The Reliability, Validity and Utility of Self-Assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 2006. № 11 (10). P. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7275/9wph-vv65
Sağlam A., Devecioğlu Kaymakçı Y. & Arslan S. Alternatif Ölçme-Değerlendirme Tekniklerinde Karşılaşılan Problemler: Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretmenleri Örneği. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009. № 28. S. 1–12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Лідія Ващенко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.