PREPARATION OF LECTURERS FOR RESEARCH-BASED LEARNING: EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2022.2.10Keywords:
research-based teaching, lecturers, programs of lecturers’ training, professional development, universityAbstract
The article deals with preparation of lecturers for research-based teaching in the framework of professional development programs at European universities. It has been noted that the development of professional competencies among lecturers, necessary for such teaching, is determined by 2 factors: the orientation of the institutional policy and corporate culture of a higher educational institution towards the introduction of a holistic system of teaching based on research, as well as professional development programs at university aimed at improvement of existing professional competencies and acquisition of the new ones. The article analyzes the experience of University College London (UK) and the University of Gohenheim (Germany) in preparation of lecturers for research-based teaching. It has been confirmed that these higher educational institutions have implemented a holistic research-based teaching system, as well as extensive professional development programs for lectures to prepare them for such teaching, including not only trainings, but also individual consultations and seminars, mentoring support from more experienced colleagues, manuals, scientific resources, online directories, etc. The article presents actual examples of introduction by lecturers of a holistic research-based teaching system into the educational process at all educational levels.
References
Brew A. Imperatives and Challenges in Integrating Teaching and Research. Higher Education Research & Development. 2010. № 29 (2). Р. 139–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903552451
Bulvinska O., Chervona L. Students’ participation in quality assuarance at university. Неперервна професійна освіта: теорія і практика. 2020. № 3. С. 95–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2020.3.11
Cao Y., Postareff L., Lindblom-Ylänne S., Toom A. A survey research on Finnish teacher educators’ research-teaching integration and its relationship with their approaches to teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1900111
Chakraborty D., Biswas W. Motivating factors in a teacher’s research and developmental activities and their impact on effective quality teaching in higher education institutions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2020. Vol. 12. № 4. P. 609–632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2018-0161
Durham M. F., Knight J. K., Couch B. A. Measurement Instrument for Scientific Teaching (MIST): A Tool to Measure the Frequencies of Research-Based Teaching Practices in Undergraduate Science Courses. CBE – Life Sciences Education. 2018. Vol. 16. № 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-02-0033
Emery N., Maher J. M., Ebert-May D. Environmental influences and individual characteristics that affect learner-centered teaching practices. PLOS ONE. 2021. № 16 (4). e0250760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250760
Fung D. A Connected Curriculum for Higher Education. London: UCL Press, 2017. 168 р. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781911576358
The Future of Jobs Report 2020. World Economic Forum. 20 October 2020. URL: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020/in-full/chapter-2-forecasts-for-labour-market-evolution-in-2020-2025 (дата звернення: 10.05.2022).
Grimes C. L., White H. B. Passing the baton: Mentoring for adoption of active-learning pedagogies by research-active junior faculty. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 2015. № 43 (5). Р. 345–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20885
Huber, L. (o.D.). Forschendes Lernen: Begriff, Begründungen und Herausforderungen. URL: https://dbs-lin.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/lehreladen/lehrformate-methoden/forschendes-lernen/begriff-begruendungen-und-herausforderungen/ (дата звернення: 09.05.2022).
Huber L. Warum Forschendes Lernen nötig und möglich ist. L. Huber, J. Hellmer& F. Schneider (Hrsg), Forschendes Lernen im Studium. Aktuelle Konzepte und Erfahrungen. Bielefeld: UVW UniversitätsVerlagWebler, 2009. S. 9–35.
Lau A., Corrales A., Goldberg F., Turpen C. A. framework for classifying opportunities to learn in Faculty Online Learning Communities: A preview with sample application. Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings. 2019. Р. 300–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/perc. 2019.pr.Lau
Lynova I., Bulvinska O. Continuing professional development of academic staff: theoretical approaches and models. Неперервна професійна освіта: теорія і практика. 2020. № 4. С. 14–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2020.4.2
Pembridge J. J., Allam Y., & Davids L. K. Influence of professional demographics on faculty feedback in asynchronous, video-annotated peer review (VAPR). 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 2015. Р. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344392
Reinmann G. Heterogenität und forschendes Lernen: Hochschuldidaktische Mög-lichkeiten und Grenzen. S. Reinders, B. Klages & M. Bonillo (Hrsg.). Gestaltungsraum Hochschullehre – Potenziale Nicht-traditionell Studierender nutzen. Opladen; Berlin; Toronto: Budrich UniPress Ltd, 2015. S. 121–137.
Rome Ministerial Communiqué. 2020, November 19. URL: https://erasmusplus.org.ua/novyny/3131-bologna-conference-in-rome-19-nov-2020.html (дата звернення: 09.05.2022).
Stewart M. Making sense of a teaching programme for university academics: Exploring the longer-term effects. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2014. Vol. 38. P. 89–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.006
Tavares de Sousa R., Lopes A., Boyd P. Initial teacher education and the relationship with research: student teachers’ perspectives. Studia paedagogica. 2020. № 25 (2). P. 161–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2020-2-8
Universität Hohenheim. URL: https://humboldt-reloaded.uni-hohenheim.de/ (дата звернення: 09.05.2022).
University College London. URL: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ (дата звернення: 09.05.2022).
Бульвінська О. Cучасні методи навчання і викладання на основі дослідження: зарубіжний досвід. Освітологічний дискурс. 2019. № 1–2. С. 83–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2019.1-2.83103
Дівінська Н. Методологія реалізації викладання в університеті на основі наукових досліджень / О. І. Бульвінська, Н. О. Дівінська, Н. О. Дяченко, О. В. Жабенко, І. О. Линьова, Ю. А. Скиба, Г. П. Чорнойван, О. Г. Ярошенко. Концепція та методологія реалізації науково-дослідницької діяльності суб’єктів навчально-виховного процесу університетів: монографія. Київ: Інститут вищої освіти НАПН України, 2016. С. 152–168.
Brew, A. (2010). Imperatives and Challenges in Integrating Teaching and Research. Higher Education Research & Development, 29 (2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903552451
Bulvinska, O., & Chervona, L. (2020). Students’ participation in quality assuarance at university. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 3, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2020.3.11
Cao, Y., Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Toom, A. (2021). A survey research on Finnish teacher educators’ research-teaching integration and its relationship with their approaches to teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1900111
Chakraborty, D. & Biswas, W. (2020). Motivating factors in a teacher’s research and developmental activities and their impact on effective quality teaching in higher education institutions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12 (4), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2018-0161
Durham, M. F., Knight, J. K., Couch, B. A. (2018). Measurement Instrument for Scientific Teaching (MIST): A Tool to Measure the Frequencies of Research-Based Teaching Practices in Undergraduate Science Courses. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 16 (4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-02-0033
Emery, N., Maher, J. M., Ebert-May, D. (2021). Environmental influences and individual characteristics that affect learner-centered teaching practices. PLOS ONE, 16 (4), e0250760. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250760
Fung, D. (2017). A Connected Curriculum for Higher Education. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781911576358
The Future of Jobs Report 2020. World Economic Forum (2020, October 20). https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020/in-full/chapter-2-forecasts-for-labour-market-evolution-in-2020-2025
Grimes, C. L., White, H. B. (2015). Passing the baton: Mentoring for adoption of active-learning pedagogies by research-active junior faculty. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 43 (5), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20885
Huber, L. (o.D.). Forschendes Lernen: Begriff, Begründungen und Herausforderungen. https://dbs-lin.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/lehreladen/lehrformate-methoden/forschendes-lernen/begriff-begruendungen-und-herausforderungen/
Huber, L. (2009). Warum Forschendes Lernen nötig und möglich ist. In L. Huber, J. Hellmer& F. Schneider (Hrsg), Forschendes Lernen im Studium. Aktuelle Konzepte und Erfahrungen (S. 9–35). UVW UniversitätsVerlagWebler.
Lau, A., Corrales, A., Goldberg, F., Turpen, C. (2019). A framework for classifying opportunities to learn in Faculty Online Learning Communities: A preview with sample application. Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc. 2019.pr.Lau
Lynova, I., & Bulvinska, O. (2020). Continuing professional development of academic staff: theoretical approaches and models. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 4, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2020.4.2
Pembridge, J. J., Allam, Y., & Davids, L. K. (2015). Influence of professional demographics on faculty feedback in asynchronous, video-annotated peer review (VAPR). 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344392
Reinmann, G. (2015). Heterogenität und forschendes Lernen: Hochschuldidaktische Mög-lichkeiten und Grenzen. In S. Reinders, B. Klages & M. Bonillo (Hrsg,), Gestaltungsraum Hochschullehre – Potenziale Nicht-traditionell Studierender nutzen (S. 121–137). Budrich UniPress Ltd.
Rome Ministerial Communiqué (2020, November 19). https://erasmusplus.org.ua/novyny/3131-bologna-conference-in-rome-19-nov-2020.html
Stewart, M. (2014). Making sense of a teaching programme for university academics: Exploring the longer-term effects. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.006
Tavares de Sousa, R., Lopes, A., Boyd, P. (2020). Initial teacher education and the relationship with research: student teachers’ perspectives. Studia paedagogica, 25 (2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2020-2-8
Universität Hohenheim. https://humboldt-reloaded.uni-hohenheim.de/
University College London. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/
Bulvinska, O. (2019). Suchasni metodi navchannya i vikladannya na osnovi doslidzhennya: zarubizhnij dosvid [Modern methods of research-based teaching and learning: foreign experience]. Educological discourse, 1–2, 83–103. https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2019.1-2.83103
Divinska, N. (2016). Metodologiya realizaciyi vikladannya v universiteti na osnovi naukovih doslidzhen [Methodology of implementation of teaching at the university on the basis of scientific research]. In O. Bulvinska, N. Divinska, N. Diachenko, O. Zhabenko, I. Lynova, Yu. Skyba, H. Chornoivan, O. Yaroshenko (Ed.), Koncepciya ta metodologiya realizaciyi naukovo-doslidnickoyi diyalnosti sub’yektiv navchalno-vihovnogo procesu universitetiv: monografiya (рр. 152–168). IVO NAPNU.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Оксана Бульвінська
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
