ASSESSMENT OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS IN GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATION: THE VIEW OF PARTICIPANTS IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2021.2.7Keywords:
evaluation system, feedback, formative evaluations, learning outcomes, self-esteemAbstract
The article considers issues related to the need to modernize the current system of assessment of academic achievements of primary and secondary school students, due to their transition to study according to the new state educational standards. The results of the research of teachers’ and students’ views on the current assessment system, on its role in the individual approach to the student’s personality in the learning process are presented. The obtained results testify to the participants’ understanding of the shortcomings of the current assessment system and the need to develop such an approach to the assessment of educational achievements, which would eliminate the existing contradictions. The problems of the current assessment system highlighted in the article can be solved by implementing modern world practice of introduction of so-called formative assessment in the domestic educational environment, which will track individual progress of students in the learning process for timely correction, active involvement of students in the assessment process. It draws attention to the students’ understanding that the objectivity of assessment, self-assessment of educational activities, dialogic feedback should become tools of modern education. The results of the survey of students show a difference in views on assessment depending on their age. Based on the comparison of the results of the survey of participants in the educational process, the similarity of their views on the problems of the current assessment system is shown. This article is a continuation of the scientific search for ways to improve the system of monitoring and evaluation of student achievement in general secondary education.
References
Гривко А. В. Ващенко Л. С. Поточне та формувальне оцінювання в базовій та старшій профільній школі. Український педагогічний журнал. 2021. № 2. С. 35–43.
Закон України «Про повну загальну середню освіту». 2020. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/463-20#Text (дата звернення: 01.06.2021).
Енциклопедія освіти / головний ред. В. Г. Кремень. Київ: Юрінком Інтер, 2008. 1040 с.
Кендюхова А. Роль оцінювання навчальних досягнень учнів у структурі діяльності особистості. Нова педагогічна думка. 2016. № 2 (86). С. 136–139.
Локшина О. Інновації в оцінюванні навчальних досягнень учнів у шкільній освіті країн Європейського союзу. Порівняльно-педагогічні студії. 2009. № 2. С. 107–113.
Лукіна Т. О. Зміна моделі державної підсумкової атестації випускників гімназій: організаційно – методичний аспект. Український педагогічний журнал. 2020. № 2. С. 42–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2020-2-42-50
Ляшенко О. І., Лукіна Т. О., Жук Ю. О., Гривко А. В., Науменко С. О. Теоретико-методичні засади побудови моніторингових систем оцінювання якості освіти. Монографія. Київ: КОНВІ ПРІНТ, 2018. 160 с.
Морзе Н. В., Барна О. В., Вембер В. П. Формувальне оцінювання: від теорії до практики. Інформатика та інформаційні технології в навчальних закладах. 2013. № 6. С. 45–57.
Онопрієнко О. В. Формувальне оцінювання досягнень: сутність і методика застосування. Український педагогічний журнал. 2016. № 4. С. 36–42.
Шацкий С. Т. Учет – основа метода. Избранные педагогические сочинения: В двух томах. Т. 2. Москва: Педагогика, 1980. С. 224–235.
Andrade H., Bennett R., Cizek G. Handbook of Formative Assessment in the Disciplines. New York: Routledge, 2019. 294 p.
Bennett R. Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 2011. Vol. 18. № 1. Р. 5–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
Black P., Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice. 1998. Vol. 5. № 1. Р. 7–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Black P., Wiliam D. Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan. 2010. Vol. 92. № 1. Р. 81–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119
Cizek G. J., Andrade H. L. & Bennett R. E. Formative assessment: history, definition, and progress. Andrade, H. L., Bennett, R. E. & Cizek, G. J. (Eds.), Handbook of Formative Assessment in the Disciplines. New York: Routledge, 2019. P. 3–19.
Hattie J., Timperley H. The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research. 2007. Vol. 77. № 1. P. 81–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Komorowska H. Formative evaluation – its past, present and future. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis. 2019. Volume 136. Issue 2. Р. 155–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.19.013.10608
Kruit P., Oostdam R., van den Berg E., Schuitema J. Performance Assessment as a Diagnostic Tool for Science Teachers. Research in Science Education. 2020. № 50. Р. 1093–1117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9724-9
Lane R., Parrila R., Bower M… Skrebneva I. Formative Assessment Evidence and Practice: Literature Review. Melbourne: AITSL, 2019. 174 р.
Sánchez-Macías I., Rodríguez-Media J. & Aparicio-Herguedas J. L. Evaluar la creatividad y las funciones ejecutivas: propuesta para la escuela del futuro. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado. 2021. № 24 (2). Р. 35–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.456041
Hryvko, A. V., Vashchenko, L. S. (2021). Potochne ta formuvalne otsinyuvannya v bazoviy ta starshiy profilniy shkoli [Current and formative assessment in basic and senior profile school]. Ukrayinskyy pedahohichnyy zhurnal, 2, 35–43.
Zakon Ukrayiny «Pro povnu zahalnu serednyu osvitu» [The Law of Ukraine On complete general secondary education] (2020). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/463-20#Text
Kremen, V. H. (Ed.). (2008). Entsyklopediia osvity [Encyclopedia of Education]. Yurinkom Inter.
Kendyukhova, A. (2016). Rol otsinyuvannya navchalnykh dosyahnen uchniv u strukturi diyalnosti osobystosti [The role of assessing student achievement in the structure of personality]. Nova pedahohichna dumka, 86, 136–139.
Lokshyna, O. (2009). Innovatsiyi v otsinyuvanni navchalnykh dosyahnen uchniv u shkilniy osviti krayin Yevropeyskoho soyuzu [Innovations in the assessment of students’ academic achievements in school education in the European Union]. Porivnyalno-pedahohichni studiyi, 2, 107–113.
Lukina, T. O. (2020). Zmina modeli derzhavnoyi pidsumkovoyi atestatsiyi vypusknykiv himnaziy: orhanizatsiyno – metodychnyy aspekt [Change of the model of state final attestation of gymnasium graduates: organizational and methodological aspects]. Ukrayinskyy pedahohichnyy zhurnal, 2, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2020-2-42-50
Lyashenko, O. I., Lukina, T. O., Zhuk, Yu. O., Hryvko, A. V., Naumenko, S. O. (2018). Teoretyko-metodychni zasady pobudovy monitorynhovykh system otsinyuvannya yakosti osvity. [Theoretical and methodological principles of construction of monitoring systems for assessing the quality of education]. KONVI PRINT.
Morze, N. V., Barna, O. V., Vember, V. P. (2013). Formuvalne otsinyuvannya: vid teoriyi do praktyky [Formative assessment: from theory to practice]. Informatyka ta informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi v navchalnykh zakladakh, 6, 45–57.
Onopriyenko, O. V. (2016). Formuvalne otsinyuvannya dosyahnen: sutnist i metodyka zastosuvannya [Formative assessment of students’ academic achievements: the nature and the methodology of implementation]. Ukrayinskyy pedahohichnyy zhurnal, 4, 36–42
Shatskyy, S. T. (1980). Uchet – osnova metoda [Accounting is the basis of the method]. Selected pedagogical works: In two volumes. Vol. 2, 224–235. Pedahohyka.
Andrade, H., Bennett, R., Cizek, G. (2019). Handbook of Formative Assessment in the Disciplines. Routledge.
Bennett, R. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18 (1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
Black, P., Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 5 (1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Black, P., Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92 (1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119
Cizek, G. J., Andrade, H. L. & Bennett, R. E. (2019). Formative assessment: history, definition, and progress. In H. L. Andrade, R. E. Bennett & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of Formative Assessment in the Disciplines (pp. 3–19). Routledge.
Hattie, J., Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Komorowska, H. (2019). Formative evaluation – its past, present and future. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 136 (2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.19.013.10608
Kruit, P., Oostdam, R., van den Berg, E., Schuitema, J. (2020). Performance Assessment as a Diagnostic Tool for Science Teachers. Research in Science Education, 50, 1093–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9724-9
Lane, R., Parrila, R., Bower, M… Skrebneva, I. (2019). Formative Assessment Evidence and Practice: Literature Review. AITSL.
Sánchez-Macías, I., Rodríguez-Media, J. & Aparicio-Herguedas, J. L. (2021). Evaluar la creatividad y las funciones ejecutivas: propuesta para la escuela del futuro. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 24 (2), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.456041
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Лідія Ващенко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
