IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY PRINCIPLES AT THE UNIVERSITY: EXPERIENCE OF CONDUCTING EDUCOLOGICAL DEBATES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2021.1.6Keywords:
academic integrity, debate, educology, intellectual educational game, interactive methods of work, Codes of HonorAbstract
The article analyzes the experience of introducing academic integrity on the example of an intellectual educational game – a debate at the Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University. Such work has become traditional for the University residents on the basis of the educational circle «Educological Discourse» of the Research Laboratory of Educology and the Pedagogical Institute of the University.
The purpose of the scientific article is to present the experience of conducting Educological debates on the introduction of academic integrity and their impact on improving the quality of higher education. The theoretical basis of the «Educological Debate» is the scientific direction of integrated research in the field of education – Educology, which is a synergy of such educational sciences as philosophy of education, history of education, educational policy, educational law, education management, economics of education, sociology of education, cultural education. These educational sciences make up the content of educational training, provide an opportunity to analyze and reveal various aspects of academic integrity.
The «Educological debates» have polemical nature. The teams are able to demonstrate the main areas of work during the «Educological Debates». The principles, mechanisms of academic integrity introduction which can improve quality of education are resulted.
The role of meetings in the format of an intellectual educational game is emphasized. The game serves as an impetus for awareness and desire to continue working on the creation and search for tools and mechanisms for the academic integrity introduction in the academic space.
The conclusions of this work on the importance of informing students about the normative and legal, moral and ethical principles of combating plagiarism, teaching students the rules of ethical behavior in the academic environment are made. It is mentioned about the interactive teaching method of debates, which is effective for the development of both professional and general competencies of students. It helps to increase the level of critical thinking and communication skills.
References
Академічна доброчесність: проблеми дотримання та пріоритети поширення серед молодих вчених: колективна монографія / за заг. ред. Н. Г. Сорокіної, А. Є. Артюхова, І. О. Дегтярьової. Дніпро: ДРІДУ НАДУ, 2017. 169 с.
Батечко Н., Михайліченко М. Феномен академічної доброчесності в контексті синергії наукових підходів. Освітологія. 2019. № 8. С. 26–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2226-3012.2019.8.2633
Забезпечення якості вищої освіти: європейські кращі практики для України. Авторський колектив: Г. Воскобойникова, М. Головянко, С. Гришко, О. Джеджора, Т. Добко та ін.; Упорядник: Тарас Добко. 2014. URL: http://education-ua.org/ua/analytics/305-zabezpechennya-yakosti-vishchoji-osviti-evropejski-krashchi-praktikidlya-ukrajini (дата звернення: 28.02.21)
Закон України «Про освіту». 2017. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text (дата звернення: 1.03.21).
Освітологія: витоки наукового напряму: Монографія / За ред. В. О. Огнев’юка; Авторський колектив: В. О. Огнев’юк, С. О. Сисоєва, Л. Л. Хоружа, І. В. Соколова, О. М. Кузьменко, О. О. Мороз. Київ: Едельвейс, 2012. 336 с.
Положення про академічну доброчесність науково-педагогічних, наукових, педагогічних працівників та здобувачів вищої освіти Київського університету імені Бориса Грінченка. URL: https://kubg.edu.ua/images/stories/Departaments/vdd/documenty/rozdil_2/nakaz_898_26.12.2019.pdf (дата звернення: 28.02.21).
Рижко О. М. Зміна мотивації як неодмінна умова запобігання плагіату. Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія: Соціальні комунікації. 2017. Вип. 11. С. 56–63.
Рекомендації щодо забезпечення принципів академічної доброчесності / укладачі: підкомісія 303 «Академічна доброчесність». 2016. 24 с. URL: https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/vishcha-osvita/2018/10/25/recomendatsii.pdf (дата звернення: 28.02.21)
Розширений глосарій термінів та понять ст. 42 «Академічна доброчесність» Закону України «Про освіту» (від 5 вересня 2017 р.). 2018. URL: https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/vishcha-osvita/2018/10/25/glyusariy.pdf (дата звернення: 27.02.21)
Bulvinska O., & Khanykina N. Interactive methods in communicative education. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice. 2019. № 4. Р. 68–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2019.4.6873
DeWitt D., Alias N., & Siraj S. Collaborative learning: Interactive debates using padlet in a higher education institution. International Educational Technology Conference (IETC 2015), 27–29 May 2015, Istanbul, Turkey. 2015. URL: http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/13630 (дата звернення: 27.02.21)
Examining quality culture in higher education institutions. 2010. URL: https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/examining%20quality%20culture%20part%20i%20quality%20assurance%20processes%20in%20higher%20education%20inst.pdf (дата звернення: 24.02.21)
Liu G., Zhang Z., Smith S., Xu S., Pillon K., Guo H. Plagiarism and information literacy workshops for international students. V. Tavares (Ed.). Multidisciplinary Perspectives on International Student Experience in Canadian Higher Education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2021. P. 240–261. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-5030-4.ch013
Mathrani A., Han B., Mathrani S., Jha M. & Scogings Ch. Interpreting academic integrity transgressions among learning communities. International Journal for Educational Integrity. 2021. № 17 (5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00073-x
Owens C., White F. A. A 5-year systematic strategy to reduce plagiarism among first-year psychology university students. Australian Journal of Psychology. 2013. Vol. 65. Issue 1. P. 14–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12005
Park C., Kier C., Jugdev K. Debate as a Teaching Strategy in Online Education: A Case Study. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie. 2011. Vol. 37. № 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21432/T2FW2R
Rome Ministerial Communiqué 19 NOVEMBER 2020. URL: http://ehea.info/Upload/Rome_Ministerial_Communique.pdf (дата звернення: 22.02.21)
Sopova D. Conceptual bases of academic honesty formation at teachers training. The Modern Higher Education Review. 2018. № 3. Р. 120–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2518-7635.2018.3.10.
Sysoieva S. The concepts: interactive learning for adult learners. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice. 2013. № 3–4. P. 55–59.
Sysoieva S. Comparative professional education in Ukraine: current state, challenges, prospects. Education: Modern Discourses. 2018. № 1. Р. 43–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32405/2617-3107-2018-1-5
Sorokina, N. H.; Artiukhov, A. Ye., Dehtiarova, I. O. (Eds.) (2017). Akademichna dobrochesnist: problemy dotrymannia ta priorytety poshyrennia sered molodykh vchenykh [Academic integrity: compliance issues and dissemination priorities among young scholars]. DRIDU NADU.
Batechko, N., & Mykhaylicheko, М. (2019). Fenomen akademichnoyi dobrochesnosti v konteksti sinergiyi naukovih pidhodiv [Academic integrity phenomenon in the context of scientific approaches synergy]. Osvitolohiya, 8, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.28925/2226-3012.2019.8.2633
Voskoboinykova, H.; Holovianko, M.; Hryshko, S.; Dzhedzhora, O.; Dobko, T. (2014). Zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity: yevropeiski krashchi praktyky dlia Ukrainy [Ensuring the quality of higher education: European best practices for Ukraine]. http://education-ua.org/ua/analytics/305-zabezpechennya-yakosti-vishchoji-osviti-evropejski-krashchi-praktikidlya-ukrajini
Zakon Ukrainy «Pro osvitu» [The Law of Ukraine On Education] (2017). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19
Ognevyuk, V. O., Sisoyeva, S. O., Khoruzha, L. L., Sokolova, I. V., Kuzjmenko, O. M., Moroz, O. O. (2012). Osvitologiya: vitoki naukovogo napryamu: monografiya [Educology: Origins of Scientific Direction: monograf]. Edeljveyjs.
Polozhennia pro akademichnu dobrochesnist naukovo-pedahohichnykh, naukovykh, pedahohichnykh pratsivnykiv ta zdobuvachiv vyshchoi osvity Kyivskoho universytetu imeni Borysa Hrinchenka [Regulations on the academic integrity of scientific and pedagogical, scientific, pedagogical workers and applicants for higher education of the Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University] (2019). https://kubg.edu.ua/images/stories/Departaments/vdd/documenty/rozdil_2/nakaz_898_26.12.2019.pdf
Ryzhko, O. (2018). Zmina motivaciyi yak neodminna umova zapobigannya plagiatu [Change of motivation as a required condition for the prevention of plagiarism]. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Social Communications, 11, 56–63.
Rekomendatsii shchodo zabezpechennia pryntsypiv akademichnoi dobrochesnosti [Recommendations for ensuring the principles of academic integrity]/ ukladachi: pidkomisiia 303 «Akademichna dobrochesnist» (2016). https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/vishcha-osvita/2018/10/25/recomendatsii.pdf
Rozshyrenyj ghlosarij terminiv ta ponjatj st. 42 «Akademichna dobrochesnistj» Zakonu Ukrajiny «Pro osvitu» [Extended glossary of terms and concepts of Art. 42 «Academic Integrity» of the Law of Ukraine On Education] (2017). https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/vishcha-osvita/2018/ 10/25/glyusariy.pdf
Bulvinska, O., & Khanykina, N. (2019). Interactive methods in communicative education. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, (4), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2019.4.6873
DeWitt, D., Alias, N., & Siraj, S. (2015). Collaborative learning: Interactive debates using padlet in a higher education institution. In International Educational Technology Conference (IETC 2015), 27–29 May 2015, Istanbul, Turkey. http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/13630
Examining quality culture in higher education institutions (2010). https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/examining%20quality%20culture%20part%20i%20quality%20assurance%20processes%20in%20higher%20education%20inst.pdf
Liu, G., Zhang, Z., Smith, S., Xu, S., Pillon, K., Guo, H. (2021). Plagiarism and information literacy workshops for international students. In V. Tavares (Ed.), Multidisciplinary Perspectives on International Student Experience in Canadian Higher Education (рр. 240–261). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5030-4.ch013
Mathrani, A., Han, B., Mathrani, S., Jha, M. & Scogings, Ch. (2021). Interpreting academic integrity transgressions among learning communities. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17, 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00073-x
Owens, C., White, F. A. (2013). A 5-year systematic strategy to reduce plagiarism among first-year psychology university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65 (1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12005
Park, C., Kier, C., Jugdev, K. (2011). Debate as a Teaching Strategy in Online Education: A Case Study. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 37 (3). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2FW2R
Rome Ministerial Communiqué 19 NOVEMBER 2020. http://ehea.info/Upload/Rome_Ministerial_Communique.pdf
Sopova, D. (2018). Conceptual bases of academic honesty formation at teachers training. The Modern Higher Education Review, 3, 120–126. https://doi.org/10.28925/2518-7635.2018.3.10.
Sysoieva, S. (2013). The concepts: interactive learning for adult learners. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 3–4, 55–59.
Sysoieva, S. (2018). Comparative professional education in Ukraine: current state, challenges, prospects. Education: Modern Discourses, 1, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.32405/2617-3107-2018-1-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Наталія Ханикіна, Дана Сопова, Оксана Бульвінська
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
