• Iryna Reheilo Presidium of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, 52 a Sichovykh Striltsiv Str., 04053 Kyiv, Ukraine; Institute of Higher Education of the NAES of Ukraine, 9 Bastionna Str., 01014 Kyiv, Ukraine



alternative metrics, career attractiveness, evaluation of researchers, research competencies, peer-review, principles of evaluation


The problem of evaluating the university faculty research performance in the European Higher Education Area and in the European Research Area is enlightened in the paper. It is emphasized that under the transition to open science and open access and increasing digitalization, that has emerged in the higher education system due to the global COVID-19 pandemic, the problem of academic staff research performance evaluation and their career attractiveness needs to be reconsidered. The article analyses the key principles of evaluating researchers and their professional development; they are enlightened in the basic regulations of the European Commission, European University Association and European Research Area, and in the Hong Kong Principles as a part of the Open Science and Open Access Initiative. The issue of using almetrics in evaluating research outputs is actualized; it provides the «visibility» of the researcher not only for the scientific or educational community, but also for society as a whole. This expands the scope of usual indicators of research performance and provides a comprehensive and more objective measurement of researchers’ excellence. The structure of research performance evaluation is given; it should be based on an integrated approach, taking into account the peer-review, quantitative and qualitative measurements, and include all the components of university staff research activity, i.e. the scientific creativity potential and its research outputs, research supervision, young scientists’ mentoring, national and international cooperation, performing administrative duties, research dissemination, and mobility.

Author Biography

Iryna Reheilo, Presidium of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, 52 a Sichovykh Striltsiv Str., 04053 Kyiv, Ukraine; Institute of Higher Education of the NAES of Ukraine, 9 Bastionna Str., 01014 Kyiv, Ukraine

Doctor of Science in Pedagogy, Senior Researcher, Head of the Scientific and Organizational Department, Chief Research Fellow of the Department for Integration of Higher Education and Research


Blaškováa, M., Blaškoa, R., Kucharþíková, A. (2014). Competences and Competence Model of University Teachers. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 457–467.

Code of Practice for Research. Promoting good practice and preventing misconduct. (2009).

Crosier, D., Kocanova, D., Birch, P., Davykovskaia, O., Parveva, T. (2017). Eurydice Brief. Modernisation of Higher Education in Europe: Academic Staff.

Darroch, P.I., Colledge, L. H. (2016). Using research metrics responsibly and effectively as a researcher. ETH Zurich.

EURASHE’s 10 Commitments for the EHEA in 2020 – Vision & Strategies (2012). EURASHE.

European Commission Expert Group on Altmetrics (2017). Next-generation metrics: Responsible metrics and evaluation for open science. Publications Office of the European Union.

Kalpazidou, S. E.; Bührer, S.; Schraudner, M.; Reidl, S.; Müller, J.; Palmen, R.; Haase, S.; Graversen, E. K.; Holzinger, F.; Striebing, C.; Groó, D.; Klein, S.; Rigler, D.; Høg, U. E. (2018). A Conceptual Evaluation Framework for Promoting Gender Equality in and Innovation.

Kobayashi, S., Dolin, J., Søborg, A., Turner, J. (2017). Building Academic Staff Teaching Competencies: How Pedagogic Continuous Professional Development for Academic Staff Can Be Organised and Developed in Research-Intensive Universitie. In: Stensaker B., Bilbow G., Breslow L., van der Vaart R. (Eds.), Strengthening Teaching and Learning in Research Universities (pp. 103–128). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H, Barbour, V., et al. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18 (7), e3000737.

Morais, R., & Borrell-Damián, L. (2018). Open Access in European universities: Results from the 2016/2017 EUA institutional survey. EUA.

Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto.

Saenen, B., Borrell-Damián, L. (2019). Reflections on University Research Assessment: key concepts, issues and actors.,-issues-and-actors.html

Saenen, B., Morais, R., Gaillard, V., Borrell-Damián, L. (2019). Research Assessment in the Transition to Open Science.

Schiffbänker, H., Research, J. (2020). Grant allocation and gender disparity: identifying the bias factors.

The European Charter for Researchers & the Code of Conduct for their Recruitment. Європейська хартія дослідників та Кодекс працевлаштування наукових працівників (2005).

The European University Association and Science Europe Join Efforts to Improve Scholarly Research Assessment Methodologies (2019).

The National Academies Press. Fostering Integrity in Research (2017).

Togia, A., Koseoglou, E., Zapounidou, S. (2017). Alternative Metrics for the Evaluation of Scholarly Activities: An Analysis of Articles Authored by Greek Researchers.



How to Cite

Reheilo, I. (2020). ACADEMIC STAFF RESEARCH PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: THE FOREIGN EXPERIENCE. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, (4), 96–102.