AXIOLOGICAL COMPONENT OF GENRE LITERACY STRUCTURE OF FUTURE TEACHERS OF WORLD LITERATURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2020.1.5Keywords:
axiological component, future teacher of world literature, genre literacy, high school, structure of genre literacy, student-philologist, valuesAbstract
The article presents the author`s structure of genre literacy of future teachers of world literature that is a synthesis of interrelated components (informational, axiological, intercultural, and communicative-pragmatic). The importance of fiction researching in the content and form unity is emphasized as it contributes to an adequate interpretation of alien cultural work of fiction. The expediency of introducing axiological component into the structure of genre literacy future teachers of world literature is substantiated. The content of the axiological block of the structure of genre literacy of future world literature teachers is analyzed on the basis of literary studies, works on teaching methodology of Ukrainian and World literature, studies in philosophy, aesthetics, cultural studies and other social and humanities sciences. Especial attention is drawn on the issue of universal and national value dominants. The axiological component of the structure of genre literacy of world literature future teachers is aimed at awareness of the nature of fundamental values, conception of alien values, taking into account the heritage of the native culture, awareness of differences in the system of value orientations, awareness of national originality. Particular attention is paid to the concept of the phenomenon of values of the F. Kluckhohn and F. Strodtbeck. Students-philologists’ perception of these American scholars’ values orientation theory will help them to determine the nature of values, type and characteristics of culture. The article focuses on the problem of cultural shock. It is shown that the concept of dialogue of cultures helps to solve the outlined problem, and helps to understand the way of thinking of another people, let them build a strategy of intercultural dialogue. It has been proved that the perception of alien cultural values by the student-philologist is a creative process that involves an emotional adjustment to the reception of different cultural reality. It is emphasized that the axiological component of the structure of genre literacy of future teachers of world literature synthesizes the professional and personal growth of the student-philologistReferences
Astrakhan, N. I. (2013). Polifonija literaturnogho tvoru: teoretychnyj aspekt [Polyphony of a Literary Work: Theoretical Aspect]. Zhytomyrsjki literaturoznavchi studiji, 7, 175–183.
Bondarenko, I. P. (2010). Rozkoshi i zlydni japonsjkoji poeziji: japonsjka klasychna poezija v konteksti svitovoji ta ukrajinsjkoji literatury [The luxury and poverty of Japanese classical poetry in the context of word and Ukrainian literature]. Vidavnichij dim Dmytra Buragho.
Vozhdajenko, A. V. (2018). Teoretychni zasady ta praktyka aksiologhichnogho prochytannja poeziji v starshij shkoli [Theoretical Basis and Practice of Axiological Study of Poetry in High School]. Naukovi zapysky NDU im.
M. Gogola. Serija Psykhologho-pedaghoghichni nauky, 4, 9–13. 10.31654/2663-4902-2018-PP-4-9-13.
Vozhdajenko, A. V. (2019). Shkiljnyj analiz ta aksiologhichna interpretacija poeziji v starshij shkoli [School Analysis and Axiological Interpretation of Poetry in High School]. Teoretychna i dydaktychna filologhija. Serija «Pedaghogika», 30, 16–26. 10.31470/2309-15-17-2019-2-16-26.
Hrytsak, N. R. (2018). Literaturoznavchyj aspekt zastosuvannja zhanrovogho shljakhu analizu khudozhnjogho tvoru u fakhovij pidghotovci majbutnikh uchyteliv zarubizhnoji literatury [Literary criticism aspect of genre way analysis application of fictional work in professional training of future teachers of foreign literature]. Pedaghoghichnyj dyskurs, 25, 22–27. 10.31475/ped.dys.2018.25.03.
Hrytsak, N. R. (2019). Metodyka zhanrovogho analizu balad «Viljshanyj korolj» J. Gete ta «Lileja» T. Shevchenka z urakhuvannjam nacionaljnoji specyfiky [Methodology of fiction genre analysis the ballad J. Goethe «Erlkönig» and Taras Shevchenko «The Lily» on national specificity]. Visnyk Ghlukhivsjkogho nacionaljnogho pedaghoghichnogho universytetu imeni Oleksandra Dovzhenka. Pedaghoghichni nauky, 1 (39), 147–155. 10.31376/2410-0897-2019-1-39-147-155.
Dobosh, O. M. (2019). Pidghotovka majbutnikh vykhovateliv do profesijnoji dijaljnosti v polikuljturnomu osvitnjomu seredovyshhi [Training future pre-school teachers for professional activities in a multicultural educational environment]. Naukovyj visnyk Mukachivsjkogho derzhavnogho universytetu. Serija «Pedaghoghika ta psykhologhija», 1 (9), 62–66. 10.31339/2413-3329-2019-1(9)-66-70.
Klymenko, Zh. V. (2006). Teorija i tekhnologhija vyvchennja perekladnykh khudozhnikh tvoriv u starshykh klasakh zaghaljnoosvitnjoji shkoly: Monoghrafija [Theory and technology of studying translated works of art in the upper grades of secondary school: Monoghraf]. Nacionaljnyj pedaghoghichnyj universytet imeni M. P. Draghomanova.
Lihachev, D. S. (2006). Pis’ma o dobrom [Letters of good]. Nauka.
Lotman, Ju. M. (1999). Mehanizmy dialoga. Vnutri mysljashhih mirov. Chelovek – tekst – semiosfera – istorija [Dialogue mechanisms. Inside the thinking worlds. Man – text – semiosphere – history]. Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.
Macjko, D. S. (2008). Analiz efektyvnosti pedaghoghichnykh umov formuvannja ghumanistychnykh cinnostej majbutnikh uchyteliv zarubizhnoji literatury [Analysis of the effectiveness of pedagogical conditions for the formation of humanistic values of future teachers of foreign literature]. Teoretyko-metodychni problemy vykhovannja ditej ta uchnivsjkoji molodi, 12, 376–383.
Romanjuk, N. J. (2001). Zaghaljnoljudsjki i nacionaljni dukhovni cinnosti – sercevyna osvity i vykhovannja [General human and national spiritual values – the core of education and upbringing]. Visnyk DAAU, 1, 343–348.
Sekomb, M. (2012). Bazovi cinnosti ta zaghaljnoljudsjki cinnosti u mizhkuljturnomu prostori [Core values and human values in intercultural space]. Mizhnarodnyj naukovyj forum: sociologhija, psykhologhija, pedaghoghika, menedzhment: zbirnyk naukovykh pracj. NPU imeni M. P. Draghomanova, 11, 5–19.
Shevchenko, T. Gh. (2003). Zibrannja tvoriv: u 6 t. [Collection of works: in 6 vol.]. Naukova dumka.
Shpet, G. G. (1996). Vvedenie v jetnicheskuju psihologiju [Introduction to Ethnic Psychology]. Aletejja.
Oberg, K. (1960). Culture shock: adjustment do new cultural environments. Practical Anthropology, 7, 177–182.
Kluckhohn, F. (1961). Variations in Value Orientations. Row, Peterson and Co
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Natalia Hrytsak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
