DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2019.1.4245
PRODUCTIVE LEARNING TECHNOLOGY AS MEANS OF EDUCATION QUALITY PROVISION
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Українська)References
Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2009). Introducing a fifth pedagogy: Experience-based strategies for facilitating learning in natural environments. Environmental Education Research, 15 (2), 243–262 (eng).
Corte, E. D. (2000). High-powered learning communities: A European perspective. Paper presented at the First Conference of the Economic and Social Research Council’s Research Programme on Teaching and Learning, Leicester, UK (eng).
Сorte, E. D., Verschaffel, L., & Masui, C. (2004). The CLIA-model: A framework for designing powerful learning environments for thinking and problem solving. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19 (4), 365–384. DOI: 10.1007/BF03173216 (eng).
Deemer, S. (2004). Classroom goal orientation in high school classrooms: Revealing links between teacher beliefs and classroom environments. Educational Research, 46 (1), 73–90 (eng).
Felner, R. D., Seitsinger, A. M., Brand, S., Burns, A., & Bolton, N. (2007). Creating small learning communities: Lessons from the project on high-performing learning communities about «What Works» in creating productive, developmentally enhancing, learning contexts. Educational Psychologist, 42 (4), 209–221 (eng).
Fiszer, E. P. (2004). How teachers learn best: An ongoing professional development model. Lanham, MD, USA: Scarecrow Education (eng).
Fjuk, A., & Berge, O. (2005). Case: Learning the process of programming through ICT mediated apprenticeship. An Activity Theoretical Approach. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld (Ed.), Report on theoretical framework on selected core issues on conditions for productive learning in network learning environments (pp. 37–47). Lausanne, Switzerland: European Commission, DG INFSO (eng).
Gerjets, P. H., & Hesse, F. W. (2004). When are powerful learning environments effective? The role of learner activities and of students’ conceptions of educational technology. International Journal of Educational Research, 41 (6), 445– 465. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.011 (eng).
Kester, L., Kirschner, P., & Corbalan, G. (2007). Designing support to facilitate learning in powerful electronic learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23 (3), 1047–1054. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.001 (eng).
Sharan, S., & Tan, I. G. C. (2008). Organizing schools for productive learning. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink. com/content/x7n625/#section=153151&page=1 (eng).
Smeets, E. (2005). Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? Computers & Education, 44 (3), 343–355. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.003 (eng).
Stager, G. S. (2005). Papertian constructionism and the design of productive contexts for learning. Paper presented at the EuroLogo X, Warsaw, Poland. Retrieved from http://stager.org/articles/eurologo2005.pdf (eng).
System of higher education quality provision. Retrieved from http://academy.gov.ua/?lang=ukr&tip=dop&tipn=Page &page=195 (eng).
Understanding education quality. EFA Global monitoring report. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/ gmr_download/chapter1.pdf (eng).
Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in Middle School: The role of parents, teachers, and peers.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (2), 202–209 (eng).
What is productive learning? Productive learning and common understanding in Proved. Retrieved from http://www. iple.de/PROVED/documents/teacher/What%20is%20PL.pdf (eng).
GOST Style Citations
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Elena Kolomiiets