ROBOTICS IN PRIMARY SCHOOL: FROM PLAYFUL ACTIVITY TO CONSCIOUS STEM PROJECTING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-0774.2026.1.10

Keywords:

construction, educational robotics, engineering thinking, play activities, primary school, primary school student, STEM.

Abstract

The article explores the role of educational robotics as a universal didactic tool within the context of Industry 4.0. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the mechanisms of a systematic transition from playful activity to conscious STEM projecting and to define the conditions for forming innovative competence in primary school students. The research methodology is based on a combination of theoretical analysis of scientific sources and a comparative-pedagogical study of hardware platforms like LEGO Education and VEX GO, as well as virtual simulators such as Tinkercad Circuits and VEXcode VR. The research procedure involves the implementation of the “4C” cyclic model (connect, construct, contemplate, and continue), ensuring a logical transition from playful curiosity to a complete engineering design cycle. The results reveal the essence of robotics as an integrative foundation for developing engineering thinking, which stimulates divergent problem-solving and visualizes abstract scientific concepts. It is proven that the use of visual programming environments eliminates technical barriers, while the “learning-by-teaching” paradigm involving a robot partner improves long-term knowledge retention. The study justifies the effectiveness of the fragmentary integration of robotic elements into mathematics, informatics, design and technology, and the “I Explore the World” course for the comprehensive formation of soft skills. The authors identified key challenges in technology implementation, such as personnel shortages and material barriers, and outlined strategies for overcoming them through international scientific cooperation within the EDUROB project. It is concluded that the systematic transition to STEM projecting transforms the primary school into a space for scientific inquiry, where children become active creators of future technologies.

References

Bondaruk, V. (2019). Vplyv navchalnykh robototekhnichnykh konstruktoriv na rozvytok piznavalnoi aktyvnosti uchniv [The influence of educational robotechnical constructors on the development of students’ cognitive activity]. Scientific Notes of Berdyansk State Pedagogical University. Series: Pedagogical Sciences, 3, 90–96. https://doi.org/10.31494/2412-9208-2019-1-3-90-96

Drokina, A. S. (2024). Uprovadzhennia osvitnoi robototekhniky u napriami realizatsii STEM-osvity v pochatkovii shkoli [The Implementation educational robotics in the directive realisation of the STEM‐education in a primary school]. Academic Visions, 36. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14042543

Zhukov, B. (2025). Robototekhnika dlia ditei: z choho pochaty ta yaki konstruktory obraty u 2025 [Robotics for children: where to start and which kits to choose in 2025]. Robo-education.com.ua. https://robo-education.com.ua/robototexnika-dlia-ditei-z-cogo-pocati-ta-iaki-konstruktori-obrati-u-2025/

Kosheliev, O. L., & Hrytsai, S. M. (2017). Kompetentnisnyi potentsial LEGO Education u pochatkovii shkoli [Competency potential of LEGO Education in primary school]. Young Scientist, 9.2 (49.2), 5–8. http://molodyvcheny.in.ua/files/journal/2017/9.2/2.pdf

Lushchynska, O., Delenko, V., & Sholovii, M.-T. (2024). Vykorystannia robotiv BEE-BOT u pochatkovii shkoli [Using BEE-BOT robots in primary school]. Acta Paedagogica Volynienses, 2. https://doi.org/10.32782/apv/2024.2.12

Metodychni rekomendatsii shchodo rozvytku STEM-osvity v zakladakh zahalnoi serednoi ta pozashkilnoi osvity u 2025/2026 navchalnomu rotsi [Methodological recommendations for the development of STEM education in general secondary and extracurricular educational institutions in the 2025/2026 academic year] (2025). Institute of Education Content Modernization. https://osvita.ua/doc/files/news/952/95271/Metodichni_rekomendaciyi_STEM__1_.pdf

Morze, N. V., Strutynska, O. V., & Umryk, M. A. (2018). Osvitnia robototekhnika yak perspektyvnyi napriam rozvytku STEM-osvity [Educational robotics as a prospective trend in STEM-education development]. Open Educational E-Environment of Modern University, 5, 178–187. https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2018.5.178187

Moroz, N. V. (2025). Rol robototekhniky na urokakh informatyky v pochatkovii shkoli: pochatkovi kroky z konstruktorom LEGO Mindstorms [The role of robotics in informatics lessons in primary school: first steps with LEGO Mindstorms]. Innovative Pedagogy, 81 (2), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6085/2025/81.2.2

Strutynska, O. V. (2019). Aktualnist vпrovadzhennia osvitnoi robototekhniky v ukrainsku shkolu [Actuality of implementation of educational robotics in ukrainian school]. Open Educational E-Environment of Modern University, Special Issue, 324–344. https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2019s30

Shvardak, M. V. (2023). STEM-osvita zasobamy tsyfrovykh tekhnolohii [STEM education using digital technologies]. Scientific Journal of the National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Series 5. Pedagogical Sciences: Realities and Perspectives, 92 (1), 160–164. https://doi.org/10.31392/NPU-nc.series5.2023.92.1.33

Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019). A Systematic Review of Studies on Educational Robotics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 9 (2). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1223

Bernal-Lecina, M., Hernández, A., Pannatier, A., Pereyre, L., & Mondada, F. (2023). Sthymuli: a Static Educational Robot. Leveraging the Thymio II Platform. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.07013

Chaudhary, V., Agrawal, V., & Sureka, A. (2016). An Experimental Study on the Learning Outcome of Teaching Elementary Level Children using Lego Mindstorms EV3 Robotics Education Kit. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1610.09610

Chiazzese, G., Arrigo, M., Chifari, A., Lonati, V., & Tosto, C. (2019). Educational Robotics in Primary School: Measuring the Development of Computational Thinking Skills with the Bebras Tasks. Informatics, 6 (4), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics6040043

Gavrilas, L., Kotsis, K. T., & Papanikolaou, M.-S. (2024). Exploration of the prospective utilization of educational robotics by preschool and primary education teachers. Pedagogical Research, 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14049

Mukachevo State University. Educational Robotics (EduRob). https://msu.edu.ua/edurob/

Kharchenko, N., Shvardak, M., Shelestova, L., & Trubacheva, S. (2024). Analysis of the effectiveness of technology integration (interactive whiteboards, online platforms, etc.) in modern education. Brazilian Journal of Education, Technology and Society, 17 (se1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v17.nse1.65-72

Mangina, E., Psyrra, G., Screpanti, L., & Scaradozzi, D. (2023). Robotics in the Context of Primary and Preschool Education: A Scoping Review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3266631

Papadakis, S. (2020). Robots and Robotics Kits for Early Childhood and First School Age. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14 (18), 34–56. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i18.16631

Tarakli, I., Vinanzi, S., Moore, R., & Di Nuovo, A. (2025). Robots and Children that Learn Together: Improving Knowledge Retention by Teaching Peer-Like Interactive Robots. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.18365

Ualikhanovа, B. S., & Karataev, N. S. (2022). Methods of Teaching the Robotics Course in Elementary School. Bulletin of Iasaui University, 4 (126), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.47526/2022-4/2664-0686.16

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Shvardak, M. ., & Popovych, O. . (2026). ROBOTICS IN PRIMARY SCHOOL: FROM PLAYFUL ACTIVITY TO CONSCIOUS STEM PROJECTING. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 86(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-0774.2026.1.10

Issue

Section

PRACTICE OF CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION