TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES BY DISTANCE EDUCATION: SOME PECULIARITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2023.2.5Keywords:
problems of distance education, student-centerednessAbstract
The aim of the review is it to highlight some of basic key points of online educational tools. Name some of possible problems and their solutions that teacher can deal with during educational flow. Provide basic features of tools designed for online education considering certain positions we outline. The article is to describe some of most useful functions, their possible integration into curriculum and practical peculiarities of their use. Make some predictions of problems and conflicts that might occur during online education with stated tools limit use.
The author gives a suggestion that it is relevant to use learner-centered, approach. Feedback should be fast, provide the teacher with the details and have a system. It is a key to the success. The way to the student heart and mind and therefore better comprehension though a modern technology makes learning more successful. This is possible with the use of the modern technologies. Modern technologies are attention grabbing, user friendly and flexible. With use of modern technologies better results in understanding, team work as well as getting students interested in the study and attract their attention. The author claims that flexibility is the basic point for online learning correlation and functional establishment.
References
Boiko, M. M. (2019). Studentotsentrovane navchannia v protsesi upravlinnia yakistiu profesiinoi pidhotovky maibutnoho vchytelia [Student-centered learning in the quality management process of future teacher professional training]. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, 4 (31), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2019.176797
Zablotska O.S., Nikolaieva I. M. (2021). Studentotsentryzm yak trend suchasnoi osvity [Student centrism as trend of modern education]. Naukovi zapysky. Seriia: Pedahohichni nauky, 194, 29–33. https://doi.org/10.36550/2415-7988-2021-1-194-29-33
Palamarchuk, O. (2016). Vikladannya v universiteti na zasadah liderstva : navchalnij posibnik [Teaching at the university on the principles of leadership: a study guide]. Prioriteti.
Poliakova, H. A., Danylenko, I. S. (2020). Rozvytok komandnoho liderstva v osvitnomu seredovyshchi zakladu osvity [The development of team leadership in the educational environment of an educational institution] Collection of Research Papers «Pedagogical Sciences», 92, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2413-1865/2020-92-2
Riabchenko, V., Bulvinska, O. (2022). Avtonomiya universitetiv dlya stalogo rozvitku suspilstva: rezultati The Times Higher Education Impact Rankings 2022 [University autonomy for sustainable development: results of the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings 2022]. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 4 (73), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2022.4.8
Chumak, M. (2020). Metodologichni vimiri studentocentrovanogo navchannya u suchasnij vishij shkoli [Methodological dimensions of student-centered learning in modern higher education]. In Osobistist studenta ta sociokulturne seredovishe universitetu v suspilnomu konteksti: tezi dopovidej IV Vseukrayinskoyi naukovo-praktichnoyi konferenciyi (18 travnya 2020 r., m. Kyiv) (pp. 130–132). Institute of Higher Education of NAES of Ukraine.
Al-Mawee W., Kwayu, K. M., Gharaibeh, T. (2021). Student’s perspective on distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of Western Michigan University, United States. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100080
Codina, N., Valenzuela, R., Pestana, J. V., and Gonzalez-Conde, J. (2018). Relations between student procrastination and teaching styles: autonomy-supportive and controlling. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00809
Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77, 113–143. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654302985
Dakovic, G., & Zhang, T. (2020). Student-Centered Learning from a European Policy and Practice Perspective. In S. Hoidn & M. Klemenčič (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Student-Centered Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (pp. 562–580). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429259371-42
Day in the life: Teaching in Teams and Office 365. https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/driving-adoption-blog/preview-day-in-the-life-quick-sheets-for-adoption-amp-training/ba-p/278733
Dong, Y., Wu, S. X., Wang, W., and Peng, S. (2019). Is the Student-Centered Learning Style More Effective Than the Teacher-Student Double-Centered Learning Style in Improving Reading Performance? Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02630
Goudeau, S., Sanrey, C., Stanczak A., Manstead, A. & Darnon, C. (2021). Why lockdown and distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic are likely to increase the social class achievement gap. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 1273–1281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01212-7
Hanewicz, C., Platt, A., and Arendt, A. (2017). Creating a learner-centered teaching environment using student choice in assignments. Distance Education, 38, 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369349
Meet quick start guides. Google Workspace Learning Center https://support.google.com/a/users/answer/9282720?hl=en
Meet troubleshooting & more resources. Google Workspace Admin Help. https://support.google.com/a/answer/1631886#meet
Mospan, N. (2023a). Digitalisation of writing in higher education: the COVID-19 pandemic impact. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20 (2), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.08
Mospan, N. (2023b). Trends in emergency higher education digital transformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20 (1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.01.04
Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G. & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: low-on effects for online learning behavior. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91–97.
Sumbawati, M. S., Munoto, Basuki, I., Ismayati, E., Rijanto, T. (2020). Student Learning Independence in Online Learning Depends on Motivation. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Science and Engineering (IJCSE 2020). https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.201124.062
Toker, S., Baturay, M. H. (2019). What foresees college students’ tendency to use facebook for diverse educational purposes? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16 (9). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0139-0
Ulla, M. B., & Perales, W. F. (2020). The adoption of Facebook as a virtual class whiteboard: Promoting EFL students’ engagement in language tasks. TESOL Journal, 11 (3). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tesj.515
Ulla, M. B., Perales, W. F. (2021). Facebook as an integrated online learning support application during the COVID19 pandemic: Thai university students’ experiences and perspectives. Heliyon, 7 (11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08317
Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45 (2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641
Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G.-J., & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in Online Learning Environments and MOOCs: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35 (4–5), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Павло Покотило
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
